Topic 6
Limits & Continuity in Two Variables
means gets close to along every way into , not just along the axes. So can only prove that a limit does not exist: two paths, two answers. To show that a limit does exist, use continuity, algebra, or polar coordinates with a .
4 kinds of question. Open the one you are stuck on.
1Evaluate a limit of a function of two variables by substitution
e.g. “Evaluate of a polynomial, or a fraction whose bottom is not there”
Evaluate a limit of a function of two variables by substitution
e.g. “Evaluate of a polynomial, or a fraction whose bottom is not there”- 1Plug in the point and see what you get
If the bottom is not , the number you get is the limit. Polynomials, , , , , roots and their combinations are continuous where defined. A nonzero number over means the function blows up: no limit.
- 2If it is , simplify the formula
Factor and cancel, multiply by a conjugate, or split into one-variable limits. As : , , .
- 3Plug the point into the simplified form
Remember: Plug in; if 0/0, simplify and plug in again.
See it in a problem4 worked examples
Evaluate .
- 1Plug in the point and see what you get
Top: . Bottom: .
- 2If it is , simplify the formula
Not : nothing to simplify, since the function is continuous at .
- 3Plug the point into the simplified form
The limit is .
Evaluate .
- 1Plug in the point and see what you get
.
- 2If it is , simplify the formula
wherever (where the function is defined).
- 3Plug the point into the simplified form
.
Evaluate .
- 1Plug in the point and see what you get
.
- 2If it is , simplify the formula
Multiply top and bottom by . The bottom becomes , which cancels. What is left is .
- 3Plug the point into the simplified form
.
Evaluate .
- 1Plug in the point and see what you get
Top: . Bottom: . A form.
- 2If it is , simplify the formula
Split: . As , . As , .
- 3Plug the point into the simplified form
Both limits exist, so the limit is .
Common mistakes2
- Writing "does not exist" as soon as you see . It means more work, not no limit.
- Still at the origin after simplifying? Switch to polar coordinates or try two paths (the next recipes).
2Show a limit does not exist using two different paths
e.g. “Prove that the following limit does not exist”
Show a limit does not exist using two different paths
e.g. “Prove that the following limit does not exist”- 1Try the two axes through the point
At the origin: , then . Each gives a one-variable limit. Different answers: done.
- 2Same answer? Try lines
If the result depends on , two values of give two different limits. At use .
- 3Still the same? Try a curve that balances the powers
Choose , , , … so top and bottom end up with the same power.
- 4State both paths, both limits, and conclude
Remember: Two roads, two answers, no limit.
See it in a problem4 worked examples
Show that does not exist.
- 1Try the two axes through the point
: . : .
- 2Same answer? Try lines
Not needed: the axes already disagree.
- 3Still the same? Try a curve that balances the powers
Not needed: the axes already disagree.
- 4State both paths, both limits, and conclude
Along the -axis the limit is ; along the -axis it is . Different, so no limit.
The limit does not exist ( along , along ).
Evaluate or show that it does not exist.
- 1Try the two axes through the point
: . : . The axes agree, so try more.
- 2Same answer? Try lines
: , which depends on . gives ; gives .
- 3Still the same? Try a curve that balances the powers
Not needed: two lines already disagree.
- 4State both paths, both limits, and conclude
Along the limit is ; along it is . No limit.
The limit does not exist ( along , along ).
Show that does not exist.
- 1Try the two axes through the point
: . : .
- 2Same answer? Try lines
(): . Every line gives , which proves nothing.
- 3Still the same? Try a curve that balances the powers
Balance against : take . Then .
- 4State both paths, both limits, and conclude
Along the limit is ; along it is . No limit.
The limit does not exist ( along every line, along ).
Show that does not exist.
- 1Try the two axes through the point
The lines through parallel to the axes: gives ; gives .
- 2Same answer? Try lines
: . gives .
- 3Still the same? Try a curve that balances the powers
Not needed: two lines already disagree.
- 4State both paths, both limits, and conclude
Along the limit is ; along it is . No limit.
The limit does not exist ( along , along ).
Common mistakes2
- Concluding the limit exists because two paths, or every straight line, agree. Paths can only show that a limit does not exist.
- Using a path that misses the point: for use lines through , like .
3Evaluate a limit at the origin using polar coordinates
e.g. “Evaluate of a fraction whose top has a higher power than its bottom”
Evaluate a limit at the origin using polar coordinates
e.g. “Evaluate of a fraction whose top has a higher power than its bottom”- 1Substitute ,
, and means , for every at once.
- 2Simplify and pull out the power of
Cancel the powers of . Aim for (a part with only in it).
- 3Bound the part by a constant
Use , . If the part can blow up, polar alone is not enough: try paths.
- 4Squeeze: , so the limit is
If no power of is left and the answer depends on , the limit does not exist.
Remember: Polar, pull out r, bound theta, squeeze.
See it in a problem4 worked examples
Evaluate .
- 1Substitute ,
.
- 2Simplify and pull out the power of
, so and .
- 3Bound the part by a constant
.
- 4Squeeze: , so the limit is
, so the limit is .
Evaluate .
- 1Substitute ,
.
- 2Simplify and pull out the power of
, so .
- 3Bound the part by a constant
.
- 4Squeeze: , so the limit is
, so the limit is .
Evaluate .
- 1Substitute ,
.
- 2Simplify and pull out the power of
, so .
- 3Bound the part by a constant
.
- 4Squeeze: , so the limit is
, so the limit is .
Evaluate or show that it does not exist.
- 1Substitute ,
.
- 2Simplify and pull out the power of
: no power of is left.
- 3Bound the part by a constant
The part does not shrink: gives , gives .
- 4Squeeze: , so the limit is
The value depends on the direction of approach, so there is nothing to squeeze: no limit.
The limit does not exist ( along the -axis, along the -axis).
Common mistakes3
- Stopping with an answer that depends on . If the limit changes with , it does not exist.
- Calling a part bounded when its bottom can get close to , like . No constant bounds it.
- Using polar at a point other than the origin without shifting: for , set , .
4Check whether a piecewise function is continuous at a point
e.g. “Is continuous at ?”
Check whether a piecewise function is continuous at a point
e.g. “Is continuous at ?”- 1Read off the value at the point
- 2Find the limit as
Use the formula for the nearby points: polar coordinates if it seems to settle, two paths if not.
- 3Compare: continuous only if the limit exists and equals the value
Remember: Value, limit, compare.
See it in a problem3 worked examples
Let for and . Is continuous at ?
- 1Read off the value at the point
.
- 2Find the limit as
Polar: , and . The limit is .
- 3Compare: continuous only if the limit exists and equals the value
Limit equals .
Yes, is continuous at .
Let for and . Is continuous at ?
- 1Read off the value at the point
.
- 2Find the limit as
: . : . Two paths, two answers: the limit does not exist.
- 3Compare: continuous only if the limit exists and equals the value
No limit, so nothing can equal .
No: does not exist ( along , along ).
Let for and . For which is continuous at ?
- 1Read off the value at the point
.
- 2Find the limit as
Polar: . With , . The limit is .
- 3Compare: continuous only if the limit exists and equals the value
Continuous exactly when .
Common mistakes2
- Stopping because is defined. A value is not enough; the limit has to exist and match it.
- Thinking that existing partial derivatives make continuous. They do not.
Need the formulas? Must memorize · Flashcards
