Decide whether the following statement is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample. If true provide a brief justification.
If converges, then also converges.
Sequences and Series
15 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
Decide whether the following statement is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample. If true provide a brief justification.
If converges, then also converges.
What is conditional convergence?
False. For example, provides a counterexample.
False. For example if , then converges by the alternating series test, but diverges by the –test.
Remark: if we had added that is a sequence of alternating terms, then by Theorem 3.4.2 in the CLP-2 text, the statement would have been true. This is because would either be equal to or .
Describe the series based on whether and converge or diverge, using vocabulary from this section where possible.
| converges | diverges | |
| [10pt] converges | ||
| [10pt] diverges | ||
| [10pt] |
If converges, then is guaranteed to converge as well.
(That's Theorem 3.4.2 in the CLP-2 text.) So, one of the blank spaces describes an impossible sequence.
| converges | diverges | |
| [10pt] converges | converges absolutely | not possible |
| [10pt] diverges | converges conditionally | diverges |
| [10pt] |
Absolute convergence describes the situation where converges (see Definition 3.4.1 in the CLP-2 text). By Theorem 3.4.2 in the CLP-2 text, this guarantees that also converges.
Conditional convergence describes the situation where diverges but converges (see again Definition 3.4.1 in the CLP-2 text).
If diverges, we just say it diverges. The reason is that if diverges, we automatically know diverges as well, so there's no need for a special name.
| converges | diverges | |
| [10pt] converges | converges absolutely | not possible |
| [10pt] diverges | converges conditionally | diverges |
| [10pt] |
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Determine whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent; justify your answer.
conditionally convergent
The series converges by the alternating series test. On the other hand the series diverges by the limit comparison test with . So the given series is conditionally convergent.
Determine whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent.
Be careful about the signs.
The series diverges.
Note that . So we can simplify
Since , diverges by the comparison test with the divergent harmonic series . The extra overall factor of in the original series does not change the conclusion of divergence.
The series either: converges absolutely; converges conditionally; diverges; or none of the above. Determine which is correct.
Does the alternating series test really apply?
It diverges.
Since
the alternating series test cannot be used. Indeed, does not exist (for very large , alternates between a number close to and a number close to ) so the divergence test says that the series diverges. (Note that “none of the above” cannot possibly be the correct answer — every series either converges absolutely, converges conditionally, or diverges.)
Does the series converge conditionally, converge absolutely, or diverge?
What does the summand look like when is very large?
It converges absolutely.
First, we'll develop some intuition. For very large
since for all . By the -test, which is in Example 3.3.6 in the CLP-2 text, the series converges for all . So we would expect the given series to converge absolutely.
Now, to confirm that our intuition is correct, we'll first try the limit comparison theorem, which is Theorem 3.3.11 in the CLP-2 text, with and .
Unfortunately, this limit doesn't exist, so this attempt to use the limit comparison theorem has failed. Fortunately, having seen that the caused the failure, it is not hard to adjust our strategy to get a successful proof of absolute convergence. First, in step 1 below, we use the comparison test to eliminate the and then, in step 2 below, we apply the limit comparison test.
Since , we have
for all . So, by part (a) of the comparison test, which is Theorem 3.3.8 in the CLP-2 text, if the series converges, then we will have that the series also converges, and hence that the series converges absolutely.
Now, to prove that the series
converges,
we apply the limit comparison test with
and (for ). Since
and since converges by the -test, the limit comparison test tells us that the series converges. So, by step 1, converges absolutely.
Determine (with justification!) whether the series converges absolutely, converges but not absolutely, or diverges.
What does the summand look like when is very large?
It converges absolutely.
We first develop some intuition about , where we take the absolute value of the summands to consider whether the series converges absolutely. For very large , dominates and dominates so that
The series converges by the –test with . We expect the given series to converge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct, we apply the limit comparison test with
which is valid since
exists and is nonzero. Since the series converges, the series converges too. Therefore, the series converges absolutely.
Determine (with justification!) whether the series converges absolutely, converges but not absolutely, or diverges.
This is a trick question. Be sure to verify all of the hypotheses of any convergence test you apply.
It diverges.
You might think that this series converges by the alternating series test. But you would be wrong. The problem is that does not converge to zero as , so that the series actually diverges by the divergence test. To verify that the term does not converge to zero as let's write (i.e. is the term without the sign) and check to see whether is bigger than or smaller than .
So
and, in particular, for large , . Thus, for large , increases with and so cannot converge to . So the series diverges by the divergence test.
Determine (with justification!) whether the series converges absolutely, converges but not absolutely, or diverges.
Try the substitution .
It converges absolutely.
This series converges by the alternating series test. We want to know whether it converges absolutely, so we consider the seris.
We've seen similar function before (e.g. Example 3.3.7 in the CLP-2 text, with ) and it yields nicely to the integral test. Let . Note is positive and decreasing for . Then by the integral test, the series converges if and only if the integral does. We evaluate the integral using the substitution , .
Since the integral converges, the series converges, and therefore the series converges absolutely.
Show that the series converges.
Show that it converges absolutely.
See solution.
The sequence has some positive terms and some negative terms, which limits the tests we can use. However, if we consider the series , we can use the direct comparison test.
For every , , so . Since converges, then by the direct comparison test, converges as well. Then converges absolutely– in particular, it converges.
Show that the series converges.
Use a similar method to Queston 10.
See solution.
The terms of this series are sometimes negative (for odd values of where ) and sometimes positive. But, they are not strictly alternating, so we can't use the alternating series test. Instead, we use a direct comparison test to show the series converges absolutely.
Since converges (it's a geometric sum with ), by the direct comparison test, converges as well.
Then converges absolutely–and so it converges.
Show that the series converges.
Show it converges absolutely using a direct comparison test.
See solution.
The terms of this series are sometimes negative and sometimes positive. But, they are not strictly alternating, so we can't use the alternating series test. Instead, we use a direct comparison test to show the series converges absolutely.
The series converges, because it's a geometric series with . By the direct comparison test, converges as well. Then converges absolutely, so it converges.
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
Both parts of this question concern the series .
Show that the series converges absolutely.
Suppose that you approximate the series by its fifth partial sum . Give an upper bound for the error resulting from this approximation.
For part (a), replace by in the absolute value of the summand. Can you integrate the resulting function?
(a) See the solution. (b)
(a)
We need to show that converges. If we replace by in the summand, we get , which we can integate. (Just substitute .) So let's try the integral test. First, we have to check that is positive and decreasing. It is certainly positive. To determine if it is decreasing, we compute
which is negative for . Therefore is decreasing for , and the integral test applies. The substitution , , yields
Therefore
Since the integral is convergent, the series converges and the series converges absolutely.
Alternatively, we can use the ratio test with . We calculate
and therefore the series converges absolutely.
Alternatively, alternatively, we can use the limiting comparison test. First a little intuition building. Recall that we need to show that converges. The term in this series is
It is a ratio with both the numerator and denominator growing with . A good rule of thumb is that exponentials grow a lot faster than powers. For example, if the numerator is and the denominator is about . So we would guess that tends to zero as . The question is “does tend to zero fast enough with that our series converges?”. For example, we know that converges (by the –test with ). So if tends to zero faster than does, our series will converge. So let's try the limiting convergence test with and .
By l'H^opital's rule, twice,
That's it. The limit comparison test now tells us that converges.
(b) In part (a) we saw that is positive and decreasing. The limit of this sequence equals (as can be shown with l'H^opital's Rule, just as we did at the end of the third solution of part (a)). Therefore, we can use the alternating series test, so that the error made in approximating the infinite sum by the sum of its first terms, , lies between and the first omitted term, . If we use terms, the error satisfies
You may assume without proof the following:
Using this fact, approximate as a rational number, accurate to within .
Check your answer against a calculator's approximation of : what was your actual error?
You don't need to add up very many terms for this level of accuracy.
; the actual associated error (using a calculator) is about .
The error in our approximation using through term is at most . We want . By checking small values of , we see that , so if , then . So, for our approximation, it suffices to consider the first four terms of our series.
When we use a calculator, we see
So, our error is reasonably close to our bound of , and far smaller than .
Let be defined as
Show that the series converges.
Use the direct comparison test to show that the series converges absolutely.
See solution.
The terms of this series are sometimes negative and sometimes positive. But, they are not strictly alternating, so we can't use the alternating series test. Instead, we use a direct comparison test to show the series converges absolutely.
If is prime, then
If is not prime, then
For sufficiently large, , so for sufficiently large,
Since , then , so the geometric series has , so it converges. By the direct comparison test, converges as well. Then converges absolutely, so it converges.
From the UBC Math 101 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.