Select the series below that diverge by the divergence test.
(A) (B) (C) (D)
Sequences and Series
53 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
Select the series below that diverge by the divergence test.
(A) (B) (C) (D)
That is, which series have terms whose limit is not zero?
(B), (C)
, so the divergence test is inconclusive. It's true that this series diverges, but we can't show it using the divergence test.
, which is not zero, so the divergence test tells us this series diverges.
We'll show below that does not exist at all. In particular, it is not zero. Therefore, the divergence test tells us this series diverges.
Now we'll show that does not exist. Suppose that it does exist and takes the value . We will now see that this assumption leads to a contradiction. Add together the two trig identities (see Appendix A.8 in the CLP-2 text)
This gives
Taking the limit gives . Since , this forces . Now the first trig identity above gives
Taking the limit as of that gives
But that provides the contradiction. Because , we can't have both and converging to zero. So does not exist.
For all whole numbers , , so and the divergence test is inconclusive.
Select the series below whose terms satisfy the conditions to apply the integral test.
(A) (B) (C) (D)
That is, if is a function with for all whole numbers , is nonnegative and decreasing?
(A)
Let be a function with for all whole numbers . In order to apply the integral test (Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text) we need to be positive and decreasing for all sufficiently large values of .
, which is positive and decreasing for all , so the integral test does apply here.
, which is not decreasing–in fact, it goes to infinity. So, the integral test does not apply here. (The divergence test tells us the series diverges, though.)
, which is neither consistently positive nor consistently decreasing, so the integral test does not apply. (The divergence test tells us the series diverges, though.)
is positive for all whole numbers . To determine whether it is decreasing, we consider its derivative.
This is sometimes positive, and sometimes negative. (For example, if , , but if then .) Then is not a decreasing function, so the integral test does not apply.
Suppose there is some threshold after which a person is considered old, and before which they are young.
Let Olaf be an old person, and let Yuan be a young person.
Suppose I am older than Olaf. Am I old?
Suppose I am younger than Olaf. Am I old?
Suppose I am older than Yuan. Am I young?
Suppose I am younger than Yuan. Am I young?
This isn't a trick. It's meant to give you intuition to the direct comparison test.
(a) I am old (b) not enough information to tell
(c) not enough information to tell (d) I am young
(a) If Olaf is old, and I am even older, then I am old as well.
(b) If Olaf is old, and I am not as old, then perhaps I am old as well (just slightly less so), or perhaps I am young. There is not enough information to tell.
(c) If Yuan is young, and I am older, then perhaps I am much older and I am old, or perhaps I am only a little older, and I am young. There is not enough information to tell.
(d) If Yuan is young, and I am even younger, then I must also be young.
Another way to think about this is with a timeline of birthdates. People born before the threshold are old, and people born after it are young.
If I'm born before (older than) Olaf, I'm born before the threshold, so I'm old.
If I'm born after (younger than) Yuan I'm born after the threshold, so I'm young.
If I'm born after Olaf or before Yuan, I don't know which side of the threshold I'm on. I could be old or I could be young.
Below are graphs of two sequences with positive terms. Assume the sequences continue as shown. Fill in the table with conclusions that can be made from the direct comparison test, if any.
| if converges | if diverges | |
| [10pt] and if is the red series | then \rule1.5cm1pt | then \rule1.5cm1pt |
| [10pt] and if is the blue series | then \rule1.5cm1pt | then \rule1.5cm1pt |
| [10pt] |
The comparison test is Theorem 3.3.8 in the CLP-2 text. However, rather than trying to memorize which way the inequalities go in all cases, you can use the same reasoning as Question 3.
| if converges | if diverges | |
| [10pt] and if is the red series | then CONVERGES | inconclusive |
| [10pt] and if is the blue series | inconclusive | then DIVERGES |
| [10pt] |
The comparison test is Theorem 3.3.8 in the CLP-2 text. However, rather than trying to memorize which way the inequalities go in all cases, we use the same reasoning as Question 3.
If a sequence has positive terms, it either converges, or it diverges to infinity, with the partial sums increasing and increasing without bound. If one sequence diverges, and the other sequence is larger, then the other sequence diverges–just like being older than an old person makes you old.
If converges, and is the red (larger) series, then converges: it's smaller than a sequence that doesn't add up to infinity, so it too does not add up to infinity.
If diverges, and is the blue (smaller) series, then diverges: it's larger than a sequence that adds up to infinity, so it too adds up to infinity.
In the other cases, we can't say anything. If is the red (larger) series, and diverges, then perhaps behaves similarly to and diverges, or perhaps is much, much smaller than and converges.
Similarly, if is the blue (smaller) series, and converges, then perhaps behaves similarly to and converges, or perhaps is much, much bigger than and diverges.
| if converges | if diverges | |
| [10pt] and if is the red series | then CONVERGES | inconclusive |
| [10pt] and if is the blue series | inconclusive | then DIVERGES |
| [10pt] |
For each pair of series below, decide whether the second series is a valid comparison series to determine the convergence of the first series, using the direct comparison test and/or the limit comparison test.
compared to the divergent series
compared to the convergent series
compared to the convergent series
compared to the divergent series
Think about Question 4 to remind yourself which way the inequalities have to go for direct comparison.
Note that all the comparison series have positive terms, so we don't need to worry about that part of the limit comparison test.
(a) both direct comparison and limit comparison (b) direct comparison
(c) limit comparison (d) neither
(a) Since is divergent, we can only use it to prove series with larger terms are divergent. This is the case here, since . So, the direct comparison test is valid.
For the limit comparison test, we calculate:
Since the limit exists and is not zero, the limit comparison test is also valid.
(b) Since the series converges, we can only use the direct comparison test to show the convergence of a series if its terms have smaller absolute values. Indeed,
so the series are set for a direct comparison.
To check whether a limit comparison will work, we compute:
The limit does not exist, so the limit comparison test is not a valid test to compare these two series.
(c) Since the series converges, we can only use the direct comparison test to conclude something about a series with smaller terms. However,
Therefore the direct comparison test does not apply to this pair of series.
For the limit comparison test, we calculate:
Since the limit is a nonzero real number, we can use the limit comparison test to compare this pair of series.
(d) Since the series diverges, we can only use the direct comparison test to show that a series with larger terms diverges. However,
so the direct comparison test isn't valid with this pair of series.
For the limit comparison test, we calculate:
Since the series diverges, it is part (b) of the limit comparison test, Theorem 3.3.11 in the CLP-2 text, that is appropriate here. As the limit , the limit comparison test doesn't apply.
Suppose is a sequence with . Does converge or diverge, or is it not possible to determine this from the information given? Why?
The divergence test is Theorem 3.3.1 in the CLP-2 text.
It diverges by the divergence test, because .
It diverges by the divergence test, because .
What flaw renders the following reasoning invalid?
Q: Determine whether converges or diverges.
A: First, we will evaluate .
Note for .
Note also that .
Therefore, by the Squeeze Theorem, as well.
So, by the divergence test, converges.
The limit is calculated correctly.
We cannot use the divergence test to show that a series converges. It is inconclusive in this case.
The divergence test (Theorem 3.3.1 in the CLP-2 text) is inconclusive when . We cannot use the divergence test to show that a series converges.
What flaw renders the following reasoning invalid?
Q: Determine whether converges or diverges.
A: We use the integral test. Let . Note is always positive, since . Also, is continuous.
By the integral test, since the integral diverges, also diverges.
It is true that is positive. What else has to be true of for the integral test to apply?
The integral test does not apply because is not decreasing.
The integral test does not apply because is not decreasing.
What flaw renders the following reasoning invalid?
Q: Determine whether the series
converges or diverges.
A: We want to compare this series to the series . Note both this series and the series in the question have positive terms.
First, we find that when is sufficiently large. The justification for this claim is as follows:
We note that for sufficiently large.
Therefore,
Therefore,
Since and are both expressions that work out to be positive for the values of under consideration, we can divide both sides of the inequality by these terms without having to flip the inequality. So, .
Now, we claim converges.
Note . This is a geometric series with . Since , the series converges.
Now, by the Direct Comparison Test, we conclude that converges.
Refer to Question 4.
The inequality goes the wrong way, so the direct comparison test (with this comparison series) is inconclusive.
The inequality goes the wrong way, so the direct comparison test (with this comparison series) is inconclusive.
Which of the series below are alternating?
(A) (B) (C) (D)
The definition of an alternating series is given in the start of Section 3.3.4 in the CLP-2 text.
(B), (D)
Although the terms of (A) are sometimes negative and sometimes positive, they are not strictly alternating in a positive-negative-positive-negative pattern. For instance, and are both postive. So, (A) is not an alternating series.
When is a whole number, , so (B) is alternating.
Since the exponent of in (C) is even, the terms are always positive. Therefore (C) is not alternating.
(D) is an alternating series.
Give an example of a convergent series for which the ratio test is inconclusive.
For the ratio test to be inconclusive, should be 1 or nonexistent.
One possible answer: .
One possible answer: . This series converges (it's a –series with ), but if we take the ratio of consecutive terms:
The limit of the ratio is 1, so the ratio test is inconclusive.
Imagine you're taking an exam, and you momentarily forget exactly how the inequality in the ratio test works. You remember there's a ratio, but you don't remember which term goes on top; you remember there's something about the limit being greater than or less than one, but you don't remember which way implies convergence.
Explain why
or, equivalently,
should mean that the sum diverges (rather than converging).
By the divergence test, for a series to converge, we need . That is, the magnitude (absolute value) of the terms needs to be getting smaller.
By the divergence test, for a series to converge, we need . That is, the magnitude (absolute value) of the terms needs to be getting smaller. If or (equivalently) , then for sufficiently large , so the terms are actually growing in magnitude. That means the series diverges, by the divergence test.
By the divergence test, for a series to converge, we need . That is, the magnitude (absolute value) of the terms needs to be getting smaller. If or (equivalently) , then for sufficiently large , so the terms are actually growing in magnitude. That means the series diverges, by the divergence test.
Give an example of a series , with a function such that for all whole numbers , such that:
diverges, while
converges.
If is positive and decreasing, then the integral test tells you that the integral and the series either both increase or both decrease. So, in order to find an example with the properties required in the question, you need to not be both positive and decreasing.
One possible answer: , for every .
By the integral test, any answer will use a function that is not both positive and decreasing.
The terms of the series only see a small portion of the domain of the integral. We can try to think of a function that behaves “nicely" when is a whole number (that is, it produces a sequence whose sum converges), but is more unruly when is not a whole number.
For example, suppose . Then for every integer , but this is not representative of the function as a whole. Indeed, our corresponding series has terms .
Since the limit does not exist, the integral diverges.
. The series converges.
Suppose that you want to use the Limit Comparison Test on the series where . Write down a sequence such that exists and is nonzero. (You don't have to carry out the Limit Comparison Test)
Review Theorem 3.3.11 and Example 3.3.12 in the CLP-2 text.
One possible answer:
When is very large, the term dominates the numerator, and the term dominates the denominator. So when is very large . Therefore we should take . Note that, with this choice of ,
as desired.
Decide whether each of the following statements is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample. If true provide a brief justification.
If , then converges.
If , then converges.
If and diverges, then diverges.
Don't jump to conclusions about properties of the 's.
(a) In general false. The harmonic series provides a counterexample.
(b) In general false. If , then is again the harmonic series , which diverges.
(c) In general false. Take, for example, and .
(a) In general false. The harmonic series diverges by the –test with .
(b) Be careful. You were not told that the 's are positive. So this is false in general. If , then is again the harmonic series , which diverges.
(c) In general false. Take, for example, and .
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Does the series converge?
Always try the divergence test first (in your head).
No. It diverges.
First, we'll check the divergence test. It doesn't always work, but if it does, it's likely the easiest path.
Since the limit of the terms being added is not zero, the series diverges by the divergence test.
Determine, with explanation, whether the series converges or diverges.
Which test should you always try first (in your head)?
It diverges.
This precise question was asked on a 2014 final exam. Note that the term in the series is and does not depend on ! There are two possibilities. Either this was intentional (and the instructor was being particularly nasty) or it was a typo and the intention was to have . In both cases, the limit
is nonzero, so the series diverges by the divergence test.
Determine whether the series is convergent or divergent. If it is convergent, find its value.
Review the integral test, which is Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text.
The series diverges.
We usually check the divergence test first, to look for low-hanging fruit. The limit of the terms being added is zero:
so the divergence test is inconclusive. That is, we need to look harder.
Next, we might consider a comparison test–these can also provide us (if we're lucky) with an easy path. The terms we're adding look somewhat like , but our terms are smaller than these terms, which form the terms of the divergent harmonic series. So, a direct comparison seems unlikely. Now we search for more exotic tests.
Let . Note is positive and decreases as increases. So, by the integral test, which is Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text, the given series converges if and only if the integral converges. Since
diverges, the series diverges.
Does the following series converge or diverge?
A comparison might be helpful–try some algebraic manipulation to find a likely series to compare it to.
It diverges.
The terms of the series tend to 0, so we can't use the divergence test.
To generate a guess about its convergence, we do the following:
We guess that our series behaves like the harmonic series, and the harmonic series diverges (which can be demonstrated by -test or integral test). So, we guess that our series diverges. However, in order to directly compare our series to the harmonic series and show our series diverges, our terms would have to be bigger than the terms in the harmonic series, and this is not the case. So, we use limit comparison.
Since 1 is a real number greater than 0, by the Limit Comparison Test, diverges, like .
Evaluate the following series, or show that it diverges: .
This is a geometric series.
This is a geometric series with . Since , it is divergent.
This is a geometric series with . Since , it is divergent.
Evaluate the following series, or show that it diverges: .
Notice that the series is geometric, but it doesn't start at .
The series converges to .
This is a geometric series with . Since , it is convergent.
We want to use the formula , but our series does not start at 0, so we re-write it:
Does the following series converge or diverge?
Note only takes integer values: what's when is an integer?
The series converges.
For any integer , , so . So, this series converges.
Does the following series converge or diverge?
Note only takes integer values: what's when is an integer?
It diverges.
For any integer , , so
.
By the divergence test, this series diverges.
Does the following series converge or diverge? .
What's the test that you should always think of when you see a factorial?
The series converges.
Factorials grow super fast. Like, wow, really fast. Even faster than exponentials. So the terms are going to zero, and the divergence test won't help us. Let's use ratio–it's a good go-to test with factorials.
Since is a constant,
Since , by the ratio test, the series converges.
Evaluate the following series, or show that it diverges: .
This is a geometric series, but you'll need to do a little algebra to figure out .
The series converges to .
This is close to being in the form of a geometric series. First, we should have our powers be , not , but we notice , so:
Now it looks like a geometric series with
In conclusion: this (geometric) series is convergent, and its sum is .
Does the following series converge or diverge? .
Which test fits most often with factorials?
The series converges.
Usually with factorials, we want to use the divergence test or the ratio test. Since the terms are indeed tending towards zero, we are left with the ratio test.
Since the limit is a number less than 1, the series converges by the ratio test.
Does the following series converge or diverge? .
Try finding a nice comparison.
It converges.
We want to make an estimation, when gets big:
Since is a convergent series (by -test, or integral test), we guess that our series is convergent as well. If we wanted to use comparison test, we should have to show , which seems unpleasant, so let's use limit comparison.
Since the limit is a positive finite number, by the Limit Comparison Test, does the same thing does: it converges.
Show that the series converges.
With the substitution , the function is easily integrable.
Let . Then is positive and decreases as increases. So the sum and the integral either both converge or both diverge, by the integral test, which is Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text. For the integral, we use the substitution , to get
which converges by the –test (which is Example 1.12.8 in the CLP-2 text) with .
First, we rule out some of the easier tests. The limit of the terms being added is zero, so the divergence test is inconclusive. The terms being added are smaller than the terms of the (divergent) harmonic series, , so we can't directly compare these two series, and there isn't another obvious series to compare ours to. However, the terms being added seem like a function we could integrate.
Let . Then is positive and decreases as increases. So the sum and the integral either both converge or both diverge, by the integral test, which is Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text. For the integral, we use the substitution , to get
which converges by the –test (which is Example 1.12.8 in the CLP-2 text) with .
Find the values of for which the series converges.
Combine the integral test with the results about -series, Example 3.3.6 in the CLP-2 text.
Let . Then is positive for , and decreases as increases. So, we can use the integral test, Theorem 3.3.5 in the CLP-2 text.
Using the results about -series, Example 3.3.6 in the CLP-2 text, we know this integral converges if and only if , so the same is true for the series by the integral test.
Does converge or diverge?
Try the substitution .
It converges.
As usual, let's see whether the “easy" tests work. The terms we're adding converge to zero:
so the divergence test is inconclusive. Our series isn't geometric, and it doesn't seem obvious how to compare it to a geometric series. However, the terms we're adding seem like they would make an integrable function.
Set . For , this function is positive and decreasing (since it is the product of the two positive decreasing functions and ). We use the integral test with this function. Using the substitution , so that , we see that
and so this improper integral converges. By the integral test, the given series also converges.
Use the comparison test (not the limit comparison test) to show whether the series
converges or diverges.
Review Example 3.3.9 in the CLP-2 text for developing intuition about comparisons, and Example 3.3.10 for an example where finding an appropriate comparison series calls for some creativity.
The series converges by the –test with .
Note that
for all . As the series converges, the comparison test says that converges too.
We first develop some intuition. For very large , dominates so that
The series converges by the –test with , so we expect the given series to converge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct, it suffices to observe that
for all . As the series converges, the comparison test says that converges too.
Determine whether the series converges.
What does the summand look like when is very large?
The series converges.
We first develop some intuition. For very large , dominates so that the numerator , and dominates 9 so that the denominator and the summand
The series converges by the –test with , so we expect the given series to converge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct, we apply the limit comparison test with
which is valid since
exists. Since the series is a convergent –series (with ratio ), the given series converges.
Note: to apply the direct comparison test with our chosen comparison series, we would need to show that
for all sufficiently large. However, this is not true: the opposite inequality holds when is large.
Does converge or diverge?
What does the summand look like when is very large?
It diverges.
Let's see whether the divergence test works here.
The summands of our series do not converge to zero. By the divergence test, the series diverges.
Let's develop some intuition for a comparison. For very large , dominates so that
The series is a geometric series with ratio and so diverges. (It also fails the divergence test.) We expect the given series to diverge too.
To verify that our intuition is correct, we apply the limit comparison test with
which is valid since
exists and is nonzero. Since the series is a divergent geometric series (with ratio ), the given series diverges. (It is possible to use the plain comparison test as well. One needs to show something like .)
Alternately, one can apply the ratio test:
Since the ratio of consecutive terms is greater than one, by the ratio test, the series diverges.
Determine, with explanation, whether each of the following series converge or diverge.
is a sneaky way to write .
(a) diverges (b) converges
(a) For large , and so . This suggests that we apply the limit comparison test with and . Since
and since diverges, the given series diverges.
(b) Since , the given series converges by the alternating series test. To check that decreases to as tends to infinity, note that
is smaller than (so that ) for all , and is smaller than (so ) for all .
Determine whether the series
converges or diverges.
What is the behaviour for large ?
The series diverges.
For large , and so
This suggests that we apply the limit comparison test with and . Since
and since diverges (by the –test with ), the given series diverges.
Determine whether each of the following series converge or diverge.
When is large, .
(a) converges (b) diverges
(a) For large , and so the numerator . For large , and so the denominator . So, for large ,
This suggests that we apply the limit comparison test with and . Since
exists and is nonzero, and since converges (by the –test with ), the given series converges.
(b) For large , and so
This suggests that we apply the limit comparison test with and . (We could also use .) Since
exists and is nonzero, and since diverges (by the –test with ), the given series diverges.
Evaluate the following series, or show that it diverges: .
This is a geometric series, but it doesn't start at .
Determine whether the series is convergent or divergent. If it is convergent, find its value.
The series is geometric.
This is a geometric series.
We use Equation 3.2.2 in the CLP-2 text with and .
Determine, with explanation, whether each of the following series converge or diverge.
.
The first series can be written as .
(a) diverges by limit comparison with the harmonic series
(b) converges by the ratio test
(a)
The given series is
First we'll develop some intuition by observing that, for very large , . We know that the series diverges by the –test with . So let's apply the limit comparison test with . Since
the series converges if and only if the series converges. So the given series diverges.
The series
The series in the brackets is the harmonic series which we know diverges, by the –test with . So the series on the right hand side diverges. By the direct comparison test, the series on the left hand side diverges too.
(b) We'll use the ratio test with . Since
the series converges.
Determine, with explanation, whether each of the following series converges or diverges.
.
.
.
(a) Converges by the limit comparison test with .
(b) Diverges by the ratio test.
(c) Diverges by the integral test.
(a) For very large , so that
We apply the limit comparison test with . Since
exists and is nonzero, and converges (by the –test with ), the given series converges by the limit comparison test.
(b) The term in this series is . Factorials often work well with the ratio test, because they simplify so nicely in quotients.
As tends to , this converges to . So the series diverges by the ratio test.
(c) We'll use the integal test. The term in the series is with , which is continuous, positive and decreasing for .
Since the integral is divergent, the series is divergent as well by the integral test.
Determine whether the series is convergent or divergent.
What does the summand look like when is very large?
It converges.
For large , the numerator and the denominator , so the th term is approximately . So we apply the limit comparison test with and . Since
exists and is nonzero, the given series converges if and only if the series converges. Since the series is a convergent -series (with ), both series converge.
What is the smallest value of such that the partial sum approximates within an accuracy of ?
Review the alternating series test, which is given in Theorem 3.3.14 in the CLP-2 text.
By the alternating series test, the error introduced when we approximate the series by is at most the magnitude of the first omitted term, . By trial and error, we find that this expression becomes smaller than when . So the smallest allowable value is .
It is known that (you don't have to show this). Find so that , the partial sum of the series, satisfies . Be sure to say why your method can be applied to this particular series.
Review the alternating series test, which is given in Theorem 3.3.14 in the CLP-2 text.
The sequence decreases to zero as increases to infinity. So, by the alternating series error bound, which is given in Theorem 3.3.14 in the CLP-2 text, lies between zero and the first omitted term, . We therefore need , which is equivalent to and .
The series converges to some number (you don't have to prove this). According to the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem, what is the smallest value of for which the partial sum of the series is at most away from ? For this value of , write out the partial sum of the series.
Review the alternating series test, which is given in Theorem 3.3.14 in the
CLP-2 text.
We need and then
The error introduced when we approximate by the partial sum lies between and the first term dropped, which is . So we need the smallest positive integer obeying
So we need and then
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
Determine, with explanation, whether the following series converge or diverge.
(a) converges (b) converges
(a) There are plenty of powers/factorials. So let's try the ratio test with .
Here we have used that . See Example 3.7.20 in the CLP-1 text, with and . As , our series converges.
(b) We know that the series converges, by the –test with , and also that for all . So let's use the limit comparison test with and .
So our series converges, by the limit comparison test.
(a) Prove that diverges.
(b) Explain why you cannot conclude that diverges from part (a) and the Integral Test.
(c) Determine, with explanation, whether converges or diverges.
For part (a), see Example 1.12.23 in the
CLP-2 text.
For part (b), review Theorem 3.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text.
For part (c), see Example 3.3.12 in the
CLP-2 text.
(a) See the solution.
(b) is not a decreasing function.
(c) See the solution.
(a)
Our first task is to identify the potential sources of impropriety for this integral.
The domain of integration extends to . On the domain of integration the denominator is never zero so the integrand is continuous. Thus the only problem is at .
Our second task is to develop some intuition about the behavior of the integrand for very large . When is very large:
, so that the numerator , and
, so that denominator , and
the integrand
Now, since diverges, we would expect to diverge too.
Our final task is to verify that our intuition is correct. To do so, we set
and compute
Since diverges, by Example 1.12.8 in the
CLP-2 text (To change the lower limit of integration from to , just apply Theorem 1.12.20 in the
CLP-2 text.), with , Theorem 1.12.22(b) in the
CLP-2 text now tells us that diverges too.
Let's break up the integrand as . First, we consider the integral .
, so if we can show converges, we can conclude that converges as well by the comparison test.
converges (by the –test with )
So the integral converges by the comparison test, and hence
converges as well.
Therefore, converges if and only if converges. But
diverges, so diverges.
(b) The problem is that is not a decreasing function. To see this, compute the derivative:
If , the numerator is .
Therefore, the integral test does not apply.
(c)
Set . We first try to develop some intuition about the behaviour of for large and then we confirm that our intuition was correct.
Step 1: Develop intuition.
When ,
the numerator , and the denominator
so that
and it looks like
our series should diverge by the –test (Example 3.3.6
in the CLP-2 text) with .
Step 2: Verify intuition.
To confirm our intuition we set and
compute the limit
We already know that the series diverges by the –test with . So our series diverges by the limit comparison test, Theorem 3.3.11 in the CLP-2 text.
Since and the series converges by the –test with , the series converges. Hence converges if and only if the series converges. Now is a continuous, positive, decreasing function on since
is negative for all . We saw in part (a) that the integral diverges. So the integral diverges too and the sum diverges by the integral test. So diverges.
Show that converges and find an interval of length or less that contains its exact value.
The truncation error arising from the approximation is precisely . You'll want to find a bound on this sum using the integral test.
A key observation is that, since is decreasing, we can show that
for every .
The sum is between 0.9035 and 0.9535.
Note that decreases as increases. Hence, for every ,
Then, for every ,
Substituting , ,
This shows that converges and is between and . Since , we may truncate the series at .
The sum is between 0.9035 and 0.9535. (This even allows for a roundoff error of in each term as we were calculating the partial sum.)
Suppose that the series converges and that for all . Prove that the series also converges.
What does the fact that the series converges guarantee about the behavior of for large ?
Since , there must be some integer such that for all . Then, for ,
From the information in the problem statement, we know
So, by the direct comparison test,
Since the convergence of a series is not affected by its first terms, as long as is finite, we conclude
Let's get some intuition to guide us through a proof. Since , converges must converge to zero as . So, when is quite large, , and we know converges. So, we want to separate the “large" indices from a finite number of smaller ones.
Since , there must be (We could have chosen any positive number strictly less than 1, not only .) some integer such that for all . Then, for ,
From the information in the problem statement, we know
So, by the direct comparison test,
Since the convergence of a series is not affected by its first terms, as long as is finite, we conclude
Suppose that the series converges, where for . Determine whether the series converges or diverges.
What does the fact that the series converges guarantee about the behavior of for large ?
It diverges.
By the divergence test, the fact that converges guarantees that , or equivalently, that . So, by the divergence test, a second time, the fact that
guarantees that diverges too.
Assume that the series converges, where for . Is the following series
convergent? If your answer is NO, justify your answer. If your answer is YES, evaluate the sum of the series .
What does the fact that the series converges guarantee about the behavior of for large ?
It converges to ,
By the divergence test, the fact that converges guarantees that , or equivalently, that
The series of interest can be written which looks like a telescoping series. So we'll compute the partial sum
and then take the limit
Prove that if for all and if the series converges, then the series also converges.
What does the fact that the series converges guarantee about the behavior of for large ? When is ?
See the solution.
We are told that converges. Thus we must have that . In particular, there is an index such that for all . Then:
By the direct comparison test,
Since convergence doesn't depend on the first terms of a series for any finite ,
Suppose the frequency of word use in a language has the following pattern:
The -th most frequently used word accounts for percent of the total words used.
So, in a text of 100 words, we expect the most frequently used word to appear times, while the second-most-frequently used word should appear about times, and so on.
If books written in this language use distinct words, then the most commonly used word accounts for roughly what percentage of total words used?
If we add together the frequencies of all the words, they should amount to 100%. We can approximate this sum using ideas from Example 3.3.4 in the CLP-2 text.
About 9% to 10%
The most-commonly used word makes up percent of all the words. So, we want to find .
If we add together the frequencies of all the words, they should amount to 100%. That is,
We can approximate the sum (with left as a parameter) using the ideas behind the integral test. (See Example 3.3.4.)
As we see in the diagram above, (which is the sum of the areas of the rectangles) is greater than (the area under the curve). That is,
Using the fact that our language's 20,000 words make up 100% of the words used, we can find a lower bound for .
We can find an upper bound for in a similar manner.
From the diagram, we see (which is the sum of the areas of the rectangles, excluding the first) is less than . (The reason for excluding the first rectangle is to avoid comparing our series to an integral that diverges.) That is,
Therefore,
Using a calculator, we see
So, the most-commonly used word makes up about 9-10 percent of the total words.
Suppose the sizes of cities in a country adhere to the following pattern: if the largest city has population , then the -th largest city has population .
If the largest city in this country has 2 million people and the smallest city has 1 person, then the population of the entire country is . (For many 's in this sum is not an integer. Ignore that.) Evaluate this sum approximately, with an error of no more than 1 million people.
We are approximating a finite sum — not an infinite series. To get greater accuracy, use exact values for the first several terms in the sum, and use an integral to approximate the rest.
The total population is between 29,820,091 and 30,631,021 people.
Generalizing our work in Question 52, we find the approximations:
when . The inequality can be read off of the sketch
and the inequality can be read off of the sketch
We will evaluate the total population by writing
and applying the above integral approximations to the second sum. We want our error to be less than one million, so we need to choose a value of such that:
The first term is extremely close to 0, so we ignore it.
Since , we use . That is, we will approximate the value of using an integral. Then, we will use that approximation to estimate our total population.
From the UBC Math 101 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.