Write out the chain rule for each of the following functions.
for
for
for
Partial Derivatives
27 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
Review §2.4.1 in the CLP-3 text.
(a)
(b)
(c)
A piece of the surface is shown below for some continuously differentiable function . The level curve is marked with a blue line. The three points , , and lie on the surface.
On the level curve , we can think of as a function of . Let . We approximate, at , and . Identify the quantities , , and from the diagram.
This is a visualization, in a simplified setting, of Example 2.4.10 in CLP3.
To visualize, in a simplified setting, the situation from Example 2.4.10 in CLP3, note that is the rate of change of as we slide along the blue line, while is the change of as we slide along the orange line.
In the approximation , starting at the point , and .
In the approximation , starting at the point , again, and .
Let with and depending on . Suppose that at some point and at some time , the partial derivatives , and are equal to , and respectively, while and . Find and explain the difference between and .
Pay attention to which variables change, and which are held fixed, in each context.
and . gives the rate of change of as varies while and are held fixed. gives the rate of change of . For the latter all of , and are changing at once.
Thermodynamics texts use the relationship
Explain the meaning of this equation and prove that it is true.
The basic assumption is that the three quantites , and are not independent. Given any two of them, the third is uniquely determined. They are assumed to satisfy a relationship , which can be solved to
determine as a function of and (say ) and can alternatively be solved to
determine as a function of and (say ) and can alternatively be solved to
determine as a function of and (say ).
For example, saying that determines means that
for all and . The equation
really means
So use to compute . Use other equations similar to to compute and .
See the solution.
What is wrong with the following argument? Suppose that and . By the chain rule,
Hence and so or .
Is the on the left hand side really the same as the on the right hand side?
The problem is that is used to represent two completely different functions in the same equation. See the solution for more details.
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Use two methods (one using the chain rule) to evaluate and given that the function , with and .
To avoid the chain rule, write explicitly as a function of and .
Evaluate in terms of partial derivatives of . You may assume that is a smooth function so that the Chain Rule and Clairaut's Theorem on the equality of the mixed partial derivatives apply.
Start by setting . It might also help to define and .
We have
All functions on the right hand side have arguments . The notation , for example, means first differentiate with respect to the second argument and then differentiate with respect to the first argument.
Find all second order derivatives of . You may assume that is a smooth function so that the Chain Rule and Clairaut's Theorem on the equality of the mixed partial derivatives apply.
Here denotes the partial derivative of with respect to its first argument, is the result of first taking one partial derivative of with respect to its first argument and then taking a partial derivative with respect to its second argument, and so on.
Assume that satisfies Laplace's equation . Show that this is also the case for the composite function . That is, show that . You may assume that is a smooth function so that the Chain Rule and Clairaut's Theorem on the equality of the mixed partial derivatives apply.
Start by showing that, because , the second derivative .
See the solutions.
Let where and . Find the values of the constants , and such that
You may assume that is a smooth function so that the Chain Rule and Clairaut's Theorem on the equality of the mixed partial derivatives apply.
The notation in the statement of this question is horrendous —
the symbol is used with two different meanings in one equation.
On the left hand side, it is a function of and ,
and on the right hand side, it is a function of and .
Unfortunately that abuse of notation is also very common.
Until you get used to it, undo this notation conflict by renaming the
function of and to . That is,
.
Then, evaluate each term on the right-hand side of the equation.
and .
Let be a function on . Denote points in by and the corresponding partial derivatives of by , , , , etc.. Assume those derivatives are all continuous. Express
in terms of partial derivatives of the function .
Let , and . Then .
is defined as
for an arbitrary function .
If , find and .
For an arbitrary show that satisfies
(b) Since is a function of only one variable, the chain rule for (say) has only one term.
(a) ,
(b) See the solution.
Let and be two functions of satisfying and . If is a function of and , find the value of when and .
At some point, you'll be using the chain rule you learned in first-semester calculus.
Just compute the first order partial derivatives of .
See the solution.
Suppose has continuous second order partial derivatives, and , . Express the following partial derivatives in terms , , and partial derivatives of .
The function depends on both and , so don't forget to account for both of these when you take its partial derivative.
(a)
(b)
with all of the partial derivatives of evaluated at .
Let , where has continuous second-order partial derivatives, and
Find when , and .
Assume that the function satisfies the equation and the mixed partial derivatives and are equal. Let be some constant and let . Find the value of such that .
Just compute , and .
.
Let be a differentiable function, and suppose it is given that . Let , where and are constants. Evaluate at the point , that is, find .
Let be a differentiable function of two variables, and let be a differentiable function of and defined implicitly by . Show that
Use implicit differentiation to find and .
See the solution.
Let for some twice differentiable function .
Find in terms of , , and (you can assume that ).
Suppose . For what constant will ?
(a)
(b)
Suppose that is twice differentiable (with ), and and .
Evaluate , and in terms of , and partial derivatives of with respect to and .
Let be another function satisfying and . Express and in terms of , and , .
This question uses bad (but standard) notation, in that the one symbol is used for two different functions, namely and . Until you get used to it, undo this notation conflict by renaming the function of and to . That is, . Similarly, rename , viewed as a function of and , to . That is, .
(a)
with the arguments of , , , and all being .
(b)
By definition, the gradient of the differentiable function at the point is
Suppose that we know
Suppose also that
and
Assuming , , and , find
Let be an arbitrary differentiable function defined on the entire real line. Show that the function defined on the entire plane as
satisfies the partial differential equation:
The equations , and define as a function of and . Determine at the point which corresponds to the point .
(b) Think of , as two equations in the two unknowns , with , just being given parameters. The question implicitly tells us that those two equations can be solved for , in terms of , , at least near , . That is, the question implicitly tells us that the functions and are determined by , . Then is determined by .
(a) See the solution. (b)
The equations
define and implicitly as functions of and (i.e. , and ) near the point at which .
Find
at .
If , determine at the point .
The question tells us that and ar eimplicitly determined by
at least near , . Then, in part (b), really means .
(a) , (b)
Let be a differentiable function, and let and . Find a constant, , such that
This question uses bad (but standard) notation, in that the one symbol is used for two different functions, namely and . A better wording is
Let and be differentiable functions such that . Find a constant, , such that
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
The wave equation
arises in many models involving wave-like phenomena. Let and be related by the change of variables
Show that if and only if .
Show that if and only if for some functions and .
Interpret in terms of travelling waves. Think of as the height, at position and time , of a wave that is travelling along the -axis.
Remark: Don't be thrown by the strange symbols and . They are just two harmless letters from the Greek alphabet, called “xi” and “eta” respectively.
Use the chain rule to show that .
See the solutions.
For each part, first determine which variables is a function of.
(a)
(b)
(c)
From the UBC Math 200 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.