Suppose is a function such that .
True or false:
Partial Derivatives
12 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
Suppose is a function such that .
True or false:
How does the behaviour of a function far away from affect its limit at ?
in general, false.
In general, this is false. Consider .
(the function is continuous)
We often (somewhat lazily) interpret the limit “" to mean that, as gets closer and closer to the origin, gets closer and closer to 10. This isn't exactly what the definition means, though. The definition tells us that, we can guarantee that be very close to 10 by choosing very close to .
The function can also be very close to 10 for some 's that are not close to . Moreover, we don't know how close to we have to be in order for to be “very close" to 10.
A millstone pounds wheat into flour. The wheat sits in a basin, and the millstone pounds up and down.
Samples of wheat are taken from various places along the basin. Their diameters are measured and their position on the basin is recorded.
Consider this claim: “As the particles get very close to the millstone, the diameters of the particles approach 50 m." In this context, describe the variables below from Definition 2.1.2 in the CLP-3 text.
In this analogy, is the diameter of a particle taken from the position in the basin.
(a) the position of the particle in the basin
(b) the position in the basin that the millstone hits
(c) 50 m
The function we're taking the limit of has its input as the position of the particle, and its output the size of the particle. So, gives the size of particles found at position . In the definition, we write . So, is the position in the basin the particle was taken from.
Our claim deals with particles very close to where the millstone hits the basin, so is the position in the basin where the millstone hits.
is the limit of the function: in this case, 50 m.
Let .
Find a ray approaching the origin along which .
Find a ray approaching the origin along which .
What does the above work show about a limit of ?
You can probably solve (a) and (b) by just staring at .
(a) along the -axis (b) along the -axis (c) does not exist
By inspection, when , then as long as . So, if we follow the -axis in towards the origin, along this route.
Also by inspection, when , then as long as . So, if we follow the -axis in towards the origin, along this route.
Since two different directions give us different values as we approach the origin, does not exist.
Let
Express the function in terms of the polar coordinates and , and simplify.
Suppose is a distance of 1 from the origin. What are the largest and smallest values of ?
Let . Suppose is a distance of from the origin. What are the largest and smallest values of ?
Let . Find a positive value of that guarantees whenever is at most units from the origin.
What did you just show?
Recall
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e)
Since and , we have that
When , . So, runs between and . It smallest value is and its largest value is .
The distance from to the origin is (for . So, at a distance , our function is . Then runs over the interval . It smallest value is and its largest value is .
Using our answer to the last part, we have that . So for , we necessarily have that whenever the distance from to the origin is at most .
For every , if we choose to be sufficiently close to (in particular, within a distance ), then is within distance of . By Definition 2.1.2 in the CLP-3 text, we have that .
Suppose is a polynomial. Evaluate , where .
Theorem 2.1.6 in the CLP-3 text
By Theorem 2.1.6, is continuous over its domain. The domain of a polynomial is everywhere; in this case, . So, is continuous at . By the definition of continuity, .
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Evaluate, if possible,
For parts (b), (c), (d), (e), switch to polar coordinates. For part (f),
(a) (b) undefined (c) undefined (d) (e) (f)
(a)
(b) Switching to polar coordinates,
which does not exist, since, for example,
if , then
while if , then
(c) Switching to polar coordinates,
which does not exist, since, for example,
if , then
while if , then
(d) Switching to polar coordinates,
since for all .
(e) Switching to polar coordinates,
Here, we used that
for all .
(f) To start, observe that
We may evaluate by l'H^opital's rule or by using the definition of the derivative to give
Similarly, we may evaluate by l'H^opital's rule or by using the definition of the derivative to give
So all together
Find the limit: .
Prove that the following limit does not exist: .
Switch to polar coordinates.
(a) (b) See the solution.
(a) In polar coordinates, , , so that
As
we have
As , the squeeze theorem yields .
(b)
In polar coordinates
As the first fraction but the second factor can take many different values. For example, if we send towards the origin along the –axis, i.e. with ,
but if we send towards the origin along the line , i.e. with ,
and if we send towards the origin along the line , i.e. with ,
So does not approach a single value as and the limit does not exist.
Evaluate each of the following limits or show that it does not exist.
(a) Switch to polar coordinates.
(b) What are the limits when (i) and and when (ii) and ?
(a)
(b) The limit does not exist since the limits (i) , and (ii) , are different.
(a) In polar coordinates
Since
and as , the limit exists and is .
(b) The limit as we approach along the -axis is
On the other hand the limit as we approach along the -axis is
These are different, so the limit as does not exist.
We can gain a more detailed understanding of the behaviour of near the origin by switching to polar coordinates.
Now fix any and let (so that we are approaching the origin along the ray that makes an angle with the positive -axis). If (i.e. the ray is not part of the -axis)
But if (i.e. the ray is part of the -axis)
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
Evaluate each of the following limits or show that it does not exist.
For part (a) switch to polar coordinates. For part (b), switch to polar coordinates centred on . That is, make the change of variables , .
(a) (b) The limit does not exist. See the solution.
(a) In polar coordinates ,
As
we have
(b) Since
and, in polar coordinates centred on , , ,
we have that the limit does not exist. For example, if we send to along the line , so that , we get the limit , while if we send to along the line , so that , we get the limit .
Define, for all , .
Let . Compute .
Compute .
Does exist?
For part (c), does there exist a single number, , with the property that is really close to for all that are really close to ?
(a) (b) (c) No.
(a) We have
Observe that, if , then
for all . If ,
So the limit exists (and is finite) for all fixed and
(b) We have
(c) Note that in part (a) we showed that as approaches along any straight line, approaches the limit zero. In part (b) we have just shown that as approaches along the parabola , approaches the limit , not zero. So takes values very close to , for some 's that are really near and also takes values very close to , for other 's that are really near . There is no single number, , with the property that is really close to for all that are really close to . So the limit does not exist.
Compute the following limits or explain why they do not exist.
For part (b), consider the ratio of (from part (b)) and (from part (a)), and recall that .
For part (d) consider the limits along the positive - and -axes.
(a), (b), (d) Do not exist. See the solutions. (c)
(a) Since, in polar coordinates,
we have that the limit does not exist. For example,
if we send to along the positive -axis, so that , we get the limit ,
while if we send to along the line in the first quadrant, so that , we get the limit .
(b) This limit does not exist, since if it were to exist the limit
would also exist. (Recall that .)
(c) Since
and the second limit is nonzero,
(d) Since the limit along the positive -axis
and the limit along the -axis
are different, the limit as does not exist.
Evaluate each of the following limits or show that it does not exist.
For part (a), determine what happens as tends to along the curve , where is any nonzero constant.
(a), (b) The limit does not exist. See the solution.
(a) Let be any nonzero constant. When and ,
So the limit along the curve is
In particular, the limit along the curve , which is , and the limit along the curve , which is , are different. So the limit as does not exist.
(b) Let be any nonzero constant. When and ,
So the limit along the curve is
In particular, the limit along the curve , which is , and the limit along the curve , which is , are different. So the limit as does not exist.
From the UBC Math 200 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.