The method of integration by substitution comes from the rule for differentiation.
The method of integration by parts comes from the rule for differentiation.
Hint+
Read back over Sections 1.4 and 1.7
of the CLP-2 text. When these methods are introduced, they are justified using the
corresponding differentiation rules.
Suppose you want to evaluate an integral using integration by parts. You choose part of your integrand to be u, and part to be dv. The part chosen as u will be: (differentiated, antidifferentiated). The part chosen as dv will be: (differentiated, antidifferentiated).
Hint+
Remember our rule: ∫udv=uv−∫vdu. So, we take u and use it to make du, and we take dv and use it to make v.
Answer+
The part chosen as u will be differentiated. The part chosen as dv will be antidifferentiated.
Suppose we want to use integration by parts to evaluate ∫u(x)⋅v′(x)dx for some differentiable functions u and v. We need to find an antiderivative of v′(x), but there are infinitely many choices. Show that every antiderivative of v′(x) gives an equivalent final answer.
Hint+
Remember all the antiderivatives differ only by a constant, so you can write them all as v(x)+C for some C.
Answer+
All the antiderivatives differ only by a constant, so we can write them all as v(x)+C for some C. Then, using the formula for integration by parts,
In order to figure out the first product (and the second integrand), you need to know the antiderivative of f(x)–but that's exactly what you're trying to figure out!
Full solution+
2Stage 2Procedural
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
You'll probably want to use integration by parts. (It's the title of the section, after all). You'll break the integrand into two parts, integrate one, and differentiate the other. Would you rather integrate logx, or differentiate it?
You know, or can easily look up, the derivative of arccosine.
You can use a similar trick as the book did when antidifferentiating other inverse trigonometric functions in Example 1.7.9 of the CLP-2 text.
Answer+
yarccosy−1−y2+C
Full solution+
3Stage 3Application
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
This example is similar to Example 1.7.10 in the CLP-2 text. The functions ex/2 and cos(2x) both do not substantially alter when we differentiate or antidifferentiate them. If we use integration by parts twice, we'll end up with an expression that includes our original integral. Then we can just solve for the original integral in the equation, without actually integrating.
You'll want to do an integration by parts for (a)–check the end result to get a guess as to what your parts should be. A trig identity and some amount of algebraic manipulation will be necessary to get the final form.
Answer+
(a)
We integrate by parts with u=sinn−1x and dv=sinxdx,
so that du=(n−1)sinn−2xcosx and v=−cosx.
Let R be the region between the curves T(x)=xe3x and B(x)=x(1+2x) on the interval 0≤x≤3. (It is true that T(x)≥B(x) for all 0≤x≤3.) Compute the volume of the solid formed by rotating R about the x-axis.
Hint+
Your integral can be broken into two integrals, which yield to two different integration methods.
Let f(0)=1, f(2)=3 and f′(2)=4.
Calculate
∫04f′′(x)dx.
Hint+
Think, first, about how to get rid of the square root in the argument of f′′,
and, second, how to convert f′′ into f′. Note that you are told that f′(2)=4
and f(0)=1, f(2)=3.