Suppose that is a function and is an antiderivative of . Evaluate the definite integral .
Answer
Full solution
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2 (Theorem 1.3.1 in the CLP-2 text) tells us that
Integration
52 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
Suppose that is a function and is an antiderivative of . Evaluate the definite integral .
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2 (Theorem 1.3.1 in the CLP-2 text) tells us that
For the function , find its antiderivative that satisfies .
First find the general antiderivative by guessing and checking.
.
First, let's find a general antiderivative of .
One function with derivative is .
To find an antiderivative of , we might first guess ; checking, we see . So, we only need to multiply by : .
So, the general antiderivative of is . To satisfy , we need (The symbol is read “if and only if”. This is used in mathematics to express the logical equivalence of two statements. To be more precise, the statement tells us that is true whenever is true and is true whenever is true.)
So .
Decide whether each of the following statements is true or false. Provide a brief justification.
If is continuous on and differentiable on , then .
.
If is continuous on then .
Be careful. Two of these make no sense at all.
(a) True (b) False (c) False, unless .
(a) This is true, by part 2 of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Thereom 1.3.1 in the CLP-2 text with and replaced by .
(b) This is not only false, but it makes no sense at all. The integrand is strictly positive so the integral has to be strictly positive. In fact it's . The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus does not apply because the integrand has an infinite discontinuity at .
(c) This is not only false, but it makes no sense at all, unless . The left hand side is a number. The right hand side is a number times .
For example, if , and , then the left hand side is and the right hand side is .
True or false: an antiderivative of is (where by we mean logarithm base ).
Check by differentiating.
false
This is a tempting thought:
so perhaps similarly
We check by differentiating:
So, it wasn't so easy: false.
When we're guessing antiderivatives, we often need to adjust our original guesses a little. Changing constants works well; changing functions usually does not.
True or false: an antiderivative of is .
Check by differentiating.
false
This is tempting:
so perhaps
We check by differentiating:
So, the statement is false.
When we're guessing antiderivatives, we often need to adjust our original guesses a little. Dividing by constants works well; dividing by functions usually does not.
Suppose . What is the instantaneous rate of change of with respect to ?
Use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1.
“The instantaneous rate of change of with respect to " is another way of saying “". From the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, we know this is .
Suppose . What is the slope of the tangent line to when ?
Use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1.
The slope of the tangent line to when is exactly . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . Then .
Suppose . Give two different antiderivatives of .
You already know that is an antiderivative of .
For any constant , is an antiderivative of . So, for example, and are both antiderivatives of .
For any constant , is an antiderivative of , because . So, for example, and are both antiderivatives of .
(a) Recall .
(b) All antiderivatives of differ from one another by a constant. You already know one antiderivative.
We differentiate with respect to . Recall . To differentiate , we use the product and chain rules.
We differentiate with respect to . Recall . To differentiate , we use the product and chain rules.
Let . We showed in part (a) that is an antiderivative of . Since is also an antiderivative of , for some constant (this is Lemma 1.3.8 in the CLP-2 text).
Note , so if , then . That is,
Evaluate the following integrals using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2, or explain why it does not apply.
.
.
.
In order to apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2, the integrand must be continuous over the interval of integration.
(a) 0 (b),(c) The FTC does not apply, because the integrand is not continuous over the interval of integration.
The antiderivative of is , and is continuous everywhere, so .
Since is discontinuous at , the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2 does not apply to .
Since is discontinuous at , the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2 does not apply to .
As in the proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, let . In the diagram below, shade the area corresponding to .
Use the definition of as an area.
Using the definition of , is the area under the curve from to , and is the area under the curve from to . These are shown on the same diagram, below.
Then the area represented by is the area that is outside the red, but inside the blue. Equivalently, it is .
Let , where is shown in the graph below, and .
Is positive, negative, or zero?
Where is increasing and where is it decreasing?
represents net signed area.
(a) zero (b) increasing when and ; decreasing when
We evaluate using the definition: . Although , the area from to is zero.
As moves along, adds bits of signed area. If it's adding positive area, it's increasing, and if it's adding negative area, it's decreasing. So, is increasing when and , and is decreasing when .
Let , where is shown in the graph below, and .
Is positive, negative, or zero?
Where is increasing and where is it decreasing?
Note , when is defined as in Question 12.
(a) zero (b) is increasing when , and it is decreasing when and when .
This question is nearly identical to Question 12, with
So, increases when decreases, and vice-versa. Therefore: , is increasing when , and is decreasing when and when .
Let . Using the definition of the derivative, find .
Using the definition of the derivative, .
The area of a trapezoid with base and heights and is .
Using the definition of the derivative,
The numerator describes the area of a trapezoid with base and heights and .
So, .
Using the definition of the derivative,
The numerator describes the area of a trapezoid with base and heights and .
So, .
Give a continuous function so that is a constant.
There is only one!
If is constant, then . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . So, the only possible continuous function fitting the question is .
This makes intuitive sense: if moving doesn't add or subtract area under the curve, then there must not be any area under the curve–the curve should be the same as the -axis.
As an aside, we mention that there are other, non-continuous functions such that for all . For example, . These kinds of removable discontinuities will not factor heavily in our discussion of integrals.
So far, we have been able to guess many antiderivatives. Often, however, antiderivatives are very difficult to guess. In Questions 16 through 19, we will find some antiderivatives that might appear in a table of integrals. Coming up with the antiderivative might be quite difficult (strategies to do just that will form a large part of this semester), but verifying that your antiderivative is correct is as simple as differentiating.
Evaluate and simplify , where is some constant and is the logarithm base . What antiderivative does this tell you?
If , that tells us .
, where is a given constant, and is any constant.
So, we know
Remark: can be calculated using the method of Integration by Parts, which you will learn in Section 1.7 of the CLP-2 text.
Evaluate and simplify . What antiderivative does this tell you?
When you're differentiating, you can leave the factored out.
So,
Remark: can be calculated using the method of Integration by Parts, which you will learn in Section 1.7 of the CLP-2 text.
Evaluate and simplify , where is some constant. What antiderivative does this tell you?
After differentiation, you can simplify pretty far. Keep at it!
when is a given constant. As usual, is an arbitrary constant.
So,
Remark: can be calculated using the method of Trigonometric Substitution, which you will learn in Section 1.9 of the CLP-2 text.
Evaluate and simplify , where is some constant. What antiderivative does this tell you?
This derivative also simplifies considerably. You might need to add fractions by finding a common denominator.
Using the chain rule:
So,
Remark: can be calculated using the method of Trigonometric Substitution, which you will learn in Section 1.9 of the CLP-2 text.
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Evaluate .
Guess a function whose derivative is the integrand, then use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2.
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
Evaluate .
Split the given integral up into two integrals.
By part (d) of our “Arithmetic of Integration” theorem, Theorem 1.2.1 in the CLP-2 text,
Then by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2,
Evaluate .
The integrand is similar to , so something with arctangent seems in order.
The integrand is similar to , which is the derivative of arctangent. Indeed, we have
So, a reasonable first guess for the antiderivative might be
However, because of the chain rule,
In order to “fix" the numerator, we make a second guess:
Evaluate .
The integrand is similar to , so factoring out from the denominator will make it look like some flavour of arcsine.
The integrand is similar to . In order to formulate a guess for the antiderivative, let's factor out from the denominator:
At this point, we might guess that our antiderivative is something like . To explore this possibility, we can differentiate, and see what we get.
This is exactly what we want! So,
Evaluate .
We know how to antidifferentiate , and there is an identity linking with .
We know that , and , so
Evaluate .
Recall .
, or equivalently,
This might not obviously look like the derivative of anything familiar, but it does look like half of a familiar trig identity: .
So, we might guess that the antiderivative is something like . We only need to figure out the constants.
You might notice that the integrand looks like it came from the chain rule, since is the derivative of . Using this observation, we can work out the antideriative:
These two answers look different. Using the identity , we reconcile them:
The here is not significant. Remember that is used to designate a constant that can take any value between and . So is also just a constant that can take any value between and . As the two answers we found differ by a constant, they are equivalent.
Evaluate .
It's not immediately obvious which function has as its derivative, but we can make the situation a little clearer by using the identity :
For the remaining integral, we might guess something like . Let's figure out the appropriate constant:
If
find and .
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
So,
Let . Find the interval(s) on which is increasing.
There is a good way to test where a function is increasing, decreasing, or constant, that also has something to do with topic of this section.
is increasing when and when .
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
As is increasing whenever and is always strictly bigger than , we have increasing if and only if , which is the case if and only if and are of the same sign. Both are positive when and both are negative when . So is increasing when and when .
Remark: even without the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, since is the area under a curve from 1 to , is increasing when the curve is above the -axis (because we're adding positive area), and it's decreasing when the curve is below the -axis (because we're adding negative area).
If , find .
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text.
Write . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . Since , the chain rule gives us
Compute where .
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text.
Define . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . As the chain rule gives us
Evaluate .
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text.
Define . By the fundamental theorem of calculus, . We are to compute the derivative of . The chain rule gives
Let . Calculate .
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text.
Let . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, and, since , . Then .
Find .
See Example 1.3.6 in the
CLP-2 text.
Define , so that by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1. Then by the chain rule,
Find if .
Apply to both sides.
Applying to both sides of gives, by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, .
If where is a continuous function, find .
What is the title of this section?
Apply to both sides of . Then, by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
Consider the function .
Find .
Find the value of for which takes its minimum value.
See Example 1.3.6 in the
CLP-2 text.
(a) (b)
(a) Write
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
Hence, by the chain rule,
(b) Observe that for and for . Hence is decreasing for and increasing for , and must take its minimum value when .
If is defined by , find .
See Example 1.3.6 in the CLP-2 text.
Define . Then:
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
Hence, by the chain rule,
Evaluate }.
See Example 1.3.6 in the CLP-2 text.
Define with . Then:
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
Hence, by the chain rule,
Differentiate for .
See Example 1.3.6 in the CLP-2 text.
Define with . Then:
By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
Hence, by the chain rule,
Evaluate , where .
Split up the domain of integration.
Splitting up the domain of integration,
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
If and , find .
It is possible to guess an antiderivative for that is expressed in terms of .
By the chain rule,
so is an antiderivative for and, by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2,
Remark: evaluating antiderivatives of this type will occupy the next section, Section 1.4 of the CLP-2 text.
A car traveling at applies its brakes at time , its velocity (in ) decreasing according to the formula . How far does the car go before it stops?
When does the car stop? What is the relation between velocity and distance travelled?
The car stops when , which occurs at time . The distance covered up to that time is
Compute where . Does have an absolute maximum? Explain.
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text. For the absolute maximum part of the question, study the sign of .
and achieves its absolute maximum at , because is increasing for and decreasing for .
Define . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . But , so by the chain rule,
Observe that for all so that for all and for all . Since is positive for and negative for , is also positive for and negative for . That is, is increasing for and decreasing for . So achieves its absolute maximum at .
Find the minimum value of . Express your answer as an integral.
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text. For the “minimum value” part of the question, study the sign of .
The minimum is . As runs from to , the function decreases until reaches 1 and then increases all . So the minimum is achieved for . At , .
Let and . Then and, since , . This is zero for , negative for and positive for . Thus as runs from to , decreases until reaches 1 and then increases all . So the minimum of is achieved for . At , and .
Define the function on the interval . On this interval, where does have a maximum?
See Example 1.3.5 in the
CLP-2 text. For the “maximum” part of the question, study the sign of .
achieves its maximum value at .
Define . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, . Since , and since , we have
Thus increases as runs from to to (since there) and decreases as runs from to (since there). Thus achieves its maximum value at .
Evaluate by interpreting it as a limit of Riemann sums.
Review the definition of the definite integral and in particular Definitions 1.1.9 and 1.1.11 in the
CLP-2 text.
The given sum is of the form
with , and . Since and , the right hand side is the definition (using the right Riemann sum) of
where we evaluate the definite integral using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2.
Use Riemann sums to evaluate the limit .
Review the definition of the definite integral and in particular Definitions 1.1.9 and 1.1.11 in the CLP-2 text.
The given sum is of the form
with , and . The right hand side is the definition (using the right Riemann sum) of
Below is the graph of , . Define for any in . Sketch .
Carefully check the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: as written, it only applies directly to when .
Is even or odd?
In the sketch below, open dots denote inflection points, and closed dots denote extrema.
We learned quite a lot last semester about curve sketching. We can use those techniques here. We have to be quite careful about the sign of , though. We can only directly apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1 (as it's written in your text) when . So first, let's graph the right-hand portion. Notice has even symmetry–so, if we know one half of , we should be able to figure out the other half with relative ease.
(so, passes through the origin)
Using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, when and when ; when . So, is decreasing from 1 to 3, and increasing from 0 to 1 and also from 3 to 5. That gives us a skeleton to work with.
We get the relative sizes of the maxes and mins by eyeballing the area under . The first lobe (from to has a small positive area, so is a small positive number. The next lobe (from to ) has a larger absolute area than the first, so is negative. Indeed, the second lobe seems to have more than twice the area of the first, so should be larger than . The third lobe is larger still, and even after subtracting the area of the second lobe it looks much larger than the first or second lobe, so .
We can use to get the concavity of . Note . We observe is decreasing on (roughly) and , so is concave down on those intervals. Further, is increasing on (roughly) , so is concave up there, and has inflection points at about and .
In the sketch above, closed dots are extrema, and open dots are inflection points.
Now we can consider the left half of the graph. If you stare at it long enough, you might convince yourself that is an odd function. We can also show this with the following calculation:
Knowing that is odd allows us to finish our sketch.
Define .
Find a formula for the derivative . (Your formula may include an integral sign.)
Find the equation of the tangent line to the graph of at .
In general, the equation of the tangent line to the graph of at is .
(a) (b)
(a) Using the product rule, followed by the chain rule, followed by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
(b) In general, the equation of the tangent line to the graph of at is
Substituting in the given and :
So, the equation of the tangent line is
Two students calculate for some function .
Student A calculates
Student B calculates
It is a fact that
Who ended up with the correct answer?
Recall .
Both students.
Recall that “" means that we can add any constant to the function. Since , Students A and B have equivalent answers: they only differ by a constant.
So, if one is right, both are right; if one is wrong, both are wrong. We check Student A's work:
So, Student A's answer is indeed an anditerivative of . Therefore, both students ended up with the correct answer.
Remark: it is a frequent occurrence that equivalent answers might look quite different. As you are comparing your work to others', this is a good thing to keep in mind!
Let .
Evaluate .
What is ?
Since the integration is with respect to , the term can be moved outside the integral.
(a) (b)
When ,
Using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2,
Since the integration is with respect to , the term can be moved outside the integral. That is: for the purposes of the integral, is a constant (although for the purposes of the derivative, it certainly is not).
Using the product rule and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1,
Remark: Since and play different roles in our problem, it's crucial that they have different names. This is one reason why we should avoid the common mistake of writing when we mean .
Let be an even function, defined everywhere, and let be an antiderivative of . Is even, odd, or not necessarily either one? (You may use your answer from Section 1.2, Question 20. )
Remember that antiderivatives may have a constant term.
If for all , then is even and possibly also odd.
If for some , then is not even. It might be odd, and it might be neither even nor odd.
(Perhaps surprisingly, every antiderivative of an odd function is even.)
If is even, then is odd (by the result of Question 20 in Section 1.2). So, can only be even if is both even and odd. By the result in Question 19, Section 1.2, this means is only even if for all . Note if , then is a constant function. So, it is certainly even, and it might be odd as well if .
Therefore, if for some , then is not even. It could be odd, or it could be neither even nor odd. We can come up with examples of both types: if , then is an odd antiderivative, and is an antiderivative that is neither even nor odd.
Interestingly, the antiderivative of an odd function is always even. The proof is a little beyond what we might ask you, but is given below for completeness. The proof goes like this: First, we'll show that if is odd, then there is some antiderivative of that is even. Then, we'll show that every antiderivative of is even.
So, suppose is odd and define . By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1, , so is an antiderivative of . Since is odd, for any , the net signed area under the curve along is the negative of the net signed area under the curve along . So,
By the definition of ,
That is, is even. We've shown that there exists some antiderivative of that is even; it remains to show that all of them are even.
Recall that every antiderivative of differs from by some constant. So, any antiderivative of can be written as , and . So, every antiderivative of an odd function is even.
From the UBC Math 101 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.