The quadratic approximation of a function about is
What are the values of , , , and ?
Taylor Polynomials
11 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
If is the quadratic approximation of about , then , , and .
, , ; there is not enough information to know .
If is the quadratic approximation of about , then , , and . There is no guarantee that and share the same third derivative, though, so we do not have enough information to know .
It is a very good approximation.
The quadratic approximation of about is
We subsitute , , and :
So, our approximation is .
Remark: Our approximation is exact for every value of . This will always happen with a quadratic approximation of a function that is quadratic, linear, or constant.
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
Use a quadratic approximation to estimate .
(Remember we use to mean the natural logarithm of , .)
Approximate .
We approximate the function about the point . We choose 1 because it is close to , and we can evaluate and its first two derivatives at .
So,
When :
We estimate .
Remark: a calculator approximates . We're pretty close.
You'll probably want to centre your approximation about .
We approximate the function . We can easily evaluate and ( will appear in the first derivative) at , and 0 is quite close to , so we centre our approximation about .
Using the quadratic approximation :
We approximate .
Remark: , while a calculator gives . Our approximation has an error of about .
The quadratic approximation of a function about is
The quadratic approximation of a function about is
We compute derivatives.
Substituting:
One way to go about this is to approximate the function , because then .
One approximation:
There are a few functions we could choose to approximate. For example:
. In this case, we would probably choose to approximate about (since 8 is a cube, is something we can evaluate) or .
. We can easily figure out when is a whole number, so we would want to centre our approximation around some whole number , but then gives us a problem: without a calculator, it's hard to know what is.
Since , we can use . As in the first bullet, we would centre about , or .
There isn't much difference between the first and third bullets. We'll go with , centred about .
Using the quadratic approximation :
We estimate
Remark: , and a calculator gives . Although 5 and 8 are somewhat far apart, our estimate is only off by about .
For (c), look for cancellations.
(a) (b) (c) (d)
For every value of , the term being added is simply the constant . So, . The trick is figuring out how many 1s are added. Our index takes on all integers from 5 to 30, including 5 and 30, which is 26 numbers. So, .
If you're having a hard time seeing why the sum is 26, instead of 25, think of it this way: there are thirty numbers in the collection . If we remove the first four, we get numbers in the collection .
Most of these cancel!
Compare (c) to (b).
Compare (e) and (f) to (d).
To get an alternating sign, consider powers of .
For each of these, there are many solutions. We provide some below.
For each of these, there are many solutions. We provide some below.
Remark: if we had written instead of , with everything else the same, the signs would have been reversed.
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
You can evaluate exactly.
Recall .
,
Let's start by taking the first two derivative of .
Now, we can find the quadratic approximation about .
Our quadratic approximation gives . However, is exactly equal to . We've just made the rather unfortunate approximation .
Let , and use the quadratic approximation of about (given in your text, or you can reproduce it) to approximate .
From the text, the quadratic approximation of about is
So,
We estimate .
Remark: actually, .
Be wary of indices: for example .
, ,
First, we'll show that
are equivalent:
So (a) and (d) are equivalent.
So (e) and (d) are equivalent.
Second, we'll show that
are equivalent.
Third, we'll show that
are equivalent.
Now, we have three groups, where each group consists of equivalent expressions. To be quite thorough, we should show that no two of these groups contain expressions that are secretly equivalent. They would be hard to evaluate, but we can bound them and show that no two expressions in two separate groups could possibly be equivalent. Notice that
The expressions in the blue group add to less than 200, but the expressions in the green group add to more than 245, and the expressions in the red group add to more than 1024, so the blue groups expressions can't possibly simplify to the same number as the red and green group expressions.
The expressions in the green group add to less than 1000. Since the expressions in the red group add to more than 1024, the expressions in the green and red groups can't possibly simplify to the same numbers.
We group our expressions in to collections of equivalent expressions as follows:
,
,
From the UBC Math 100 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.