If we implicitly differentiate , we get the equation . In the step where we differentiate to obtain , which rule(s) below are we using?
(a) power rule (b) chain rule (c) quotient rule
(d) derivatives of exponential functions
Computing derivatives
20 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
If we implicitly differentiate , we get the equation . In the step where we differentiate to obtain , which rule(s) below are we using?
(a) power rule (b) chain rule (c) quotient rule
(d) derivatives of exponential functions
Where did the come from?
(a) and (b)
We use the power rule (a) and the chain rule (b): the power rule tells us to “bring down the 2", and the chain rule tells us to multiply by . There is no need for the quotient rule here, as there are no quotients. Exponential functions have the form , but our function has the form , so we did not use (d).
Using the picture below, estimate at the three points where the curve crosses the -axis.
Remark: for this curve, one value of may correspond to multiple values of . So, we cannot express this curve as for any function . This is one typical situation where we might use implicit differentiation.
The three points to look at are , , and . What does the slope of the tangent line look like there?
At and , is 0; at , does not exist.
At and , the curve looks to be horizontal, if you zoom in: a tangent line here would have derivative zero. At the origin, the curve looks like its tangent line is vertical, so does not exist.
Consider the unit circle, formed by all points that satisfy .
Is there a function so that completely describes the unit circle? That is, so that the points that make the equation true are exactly the same points that make the equation true?
Is there a function so that completely describes the slope of the unit circle? That is, so that for every point on the unit circle, the slope of the tangent line to the circle at that point is given by ?
Use implicit differentiation to find an expression for . Simplify until the expression is a function in terms of only (not ), or explain why this is impossible.
A function must pass the vertical line test: one input cannot result in two different outputs.
(a) no (b) no
. It is not possible to write as a function of , because (as stated in (b)) one value of may give two values of . For instance, when , at the point the circle has slope , while
at the point the circle has slope .
(a) No. A function must pass the vertical line test: one input cannot result in two (or more) outputs. Since one value of sometimes corresponds to two values of (for example, when , is ), there is no function so that captures every point on the circle.
Remark: does capture every point on the unit circle. However, since one input sometimes results in two outputs , this expression is not a function.
(b) No, for the same reasons as (a). If is a function, then it can give at most one slope corresponding to one value of . Since one value of can correspond to two points on the circle with different slopes, cannot give the slope of every point on the circle. For example, fix any . There are two points on the circle with -coordinate equal to . At the upper one, the slope is strictly negative. At the lower one, the slope is strictly positive.
(c) We differentiate:
and solve for
But there is a in the right-hand side of this equation, and it's not clear how to get it out. Our answer in (b) tells us that, actually, we can't get it out, if we want the right-hand side to be a function of . The derivative cannot be expressed as a function of , because one value of corresponds to multiple points on the circle.
Remark: since , we could try writing
but this is not a function of . Again, in a function, one input leads to at most one output, but here one value of will usually lead to two values of .
Find the mistake(s) in the following work, and provide a corrected answer.
Suppose . We find at the point . Differentiating implicitly:
Plugging in , :
Differentiating:
The problem isn't with any of the algebra.
The derivative is only at the point : it is not constantly , so it is wrong to differentiate the constant to find . Below is a correct solution.
Plugging in , :
Differentiating the equation :
At the point , . Plugging in:
The derivative is only at the point : it is not constantly , so it is wrong to differentiate the constant to find . Below is a correct solution.
Plugging in , :
Differentiating the equation :
At the point , . Plugging in:
Find if .
Remember that is a function of . Use implicit differentiation, then collect all the terms containing on one side of the equation to solve for .
Remember that is a function of . We begin with implicit differentiation.
Now, we solve for .
If , compute .
Differentiate implicitly, then solve for .
Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to :
Now, get the derivative on one side and solve
If , then find at the points where .
Remember that is a function of . You can determine explicitly the values of for which .
At , $y' = -\dfrac{1}{\pi + 1}$. At , .
First we find the -coordinates where .
So .
Now we use implicit differentiation to get in terms of :
Now set and use to get
So at we have $y' = -\dfrac{4}{4\pi+4} = -\dfrac{1}{\pi + 1}$
and at we have
Suppose a curve is defined implicitly by
What is at the point ?
You don't need to solve for in general–only when . To do this, you also need to find at the point .
We differentiate implicitly. For ease of notation, we write for .
We're interested in , so we implicitly differentiate again.
We want to know what is when . Plugging these in yields the following:
So, we need to know what is when . We can get this from the equation , which becomes when . So, at the origin, , and
Remark: a common mistake is to stop at the equation , plug in , find , and decide . This is due to a slight sloppiness in the usual notation. When we wrote , what we meant is that at the point , . More properly written: . This is not the same as saying everywhere (in which case, indeed, would be 0 everywhere).
If compute .
Differentiate the equation and solve:
If , then find at the points where .
Plug in at a strategic point in your work to simplify your computation.
At , , and at , .
First we find the -coordinates where .
So .
Now we use implicit differentiation to get in terms of :
Now set to get
So at we have ,
and at we have .
The unit circle consists of all point . Give an expression for in terms of .
Use implicit differentiation.
We use implicit differentiation, twice.
So, we need an expression for . We use the equation to conclude :
If compute .
Differentiate the equation and solve:
If , then find at the points where .
Plug in at a strategic point in your work to simplify your computation.
At we have , and at we have .
First we find the -coordinates where .
So .
Now we use implicit differentiation to get in terms of :
Now set to get
So at we have ,
and at we have .
At what points on the ellipse is the tangent line parallel to the line ?
If the tangent line has slope , and it is parallel to , then .
,
The question asks at which points on the ellipse . So, we begin by differentiating, implicitly:
We could solve for at this point, but it's not necessary. We want to know when is equal to one:
That is, at those points along the ellipse where . We plug this into the equation of the ellipse to find the coordinates of these points.
So, the points along the ellipse where the tangent line is parallel to the line occur when and , and when and . That is, the points and .
For the curve defined by the equation , find the slope of the tangent line at the point .
You don't need to solve for in general: only at a single point.
First, we differentiate implicitly with respect to .
Now, we plug in , , and solve for :
If , find .
After you differentiate implicitly, get all the terms containing onto one side so you can solve for .
Implicitly differentiating with respect to gives
Then we gather the terms containing on one side, so we can solve for :
Let . Evaluate .
Recall .
If , then find at the points where .
You don't need to solve for for all values of –only when .
At , . At , .
First we find the -ordinates where .
So .
Now we use implicit differentiation to get in terms of :
Now set to get
So at we have ,
and at we have .
For what values of do the circle and the ellipse have parallel tangent lines?
, ,
The slope of the tangent line is, of course, given by the derivative, so let's start by finding of both shapes.
For the circle, we differentiate implicitly
and solve for
For the ellipse, we also differentiate implicitly:
and solve for
What we want is a value of where both derivatives are equal. However, they might have different values of , so let's let be the -values associated with on the circle, and let be the -values associated with on the ellipse. That is, and . For the slopes at on the circle and on the ellipse to be equal, we need:
So or . Let's think about which -values will have a -coordinate of the circle be three times as large as a -coordinate of the ellipse. If , is on the circle, and is on the ellipse, then and . In this case:
We need to be a tiny bit careful here: when , is not defined for either curve. For both curves, when , the tangent lines are vertical (and so have no real-valued slope!). Two vertical lines are indeed parallel.
So, for and for , the two curves have parallel tangent lines.
The equation defines implicitly as a function of near the point .
Compute at this point.
It can be shown that is negative when . Use this fact and your answer to (a) to make a sketch showing the relationship of the curve to its tangent line at .
For (b), you know a point where the curve and tangent line intersect, and you know what the tangent line looks like. What do the derivatives tell you about the shape of the curve?
We differentiate implicitly.
Subbing in and gives
From part (a), the slope of the curve at is , so the curve is increasing, but fairly slowly. The angle of the tangent line is . We are also told that . So the slope of the curve is decreasing as passes through 1. That is, the line is more steeply increasing to the left of , and its slope is decreasing (getting less sleep, then possibly the slope even becomes negative) as we move past .
From the UBC Math 100 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.