True or false: when and are differentiable functions.
Hint
Look at the Sum rule
Answer
True
Full solution
True: this is exactly what the Sum Rule states.
Computing derivatives
49 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
True or false: when and are differentiable functions.
Look at the Sum rule
True
True: this is exactly what the Sum Rule states.
True or false: when and are differentiable functions.
Try an example, like .
False, in general
False, in general. The product rule tells us . An easy example of why we can't do it the other way is to take . Then the equation becomes , which is false.
True or false: when and are differentiable functions.
Simplify
True
True: the quotient rule tells us
Let be a differentiable function. Use at least three different rules to differentiate in different ways, and verify that they all give the same answer.
If you're creative, you can find lots of ways to differentiate!
Constant multiple: .
Product rule: .
Sum rule: .
Quotient rule: $g'(x)=\diff{}{x}\left{\frac{f(x)}{\frac{1}{3}}\right}=
\frac{\frac{1}{3}f'(x)-f(x)(0)}{\frac{1}{9}}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}f'(x)}{\frac{1}{9}}=9\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)f'(x)=3f'(x)$.
All rules give .
If you're creative, you can find lots of ways to differentiate!
Constant multiple: .
Product rule: .
Sum rule: .
Quotient rule: $g'(x)=\diff{}{x}\left{\frac{f(x)}{\frac{1}{3}}\right}=
\frac{\frac{1}{3}f'(x)-f(x)(0)}{\frac{1}{9}}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}f'(x)}{\frac{1}{9}}=9\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)f'(x)=3f'(x)$.
All rules give .
Differentiate for .
Use linearity and the known derivatives of and .
We know, from Examples 3.3.10 and 3.3.15 in the text, that and . So, by linearity,
Let . What is , if is a whole number?
Remember .
We differentiate a few time to find the pattern.
Every time we differentiate, we multiply the original function by another factor of . So, the th derivative is given by:
Use the product rule to differentiate .
You have already seen .
We have already seen in Example 3.3.15 of the text. Now:
Find the equation of the tangent line to the graph of at .
The equation of a line can be determined using a point, and the slope. The derivative of can be found by writing .
, or
We already know that and , so we can compute the derivative of by writing ,
When this is evaluated at we get . Since we also compute , the equation of the tangent line is
A particle moves along the –axis so that its position at time is given by .
At , what is the particle's speed? That is, what is the absolute value of its velocity?
At , in what direction is the particle moving?
At , is the particle's speed increasing or decreasing?
Be careful to distinguish between speed and velocity.
(a) (b) left (c) decreasing
Let . We saw in Question 8 that . So
Hence at , (a) the particle has speed of magnitude 4, and (b) is moving towards the left. At , , so is increasing, i.e. becoming less negative. Since is getting closer to zero, (c) the magnitude of the speed is decreasing.
Calculate and simplify the derivative of
, or
We can use the quotient rule here.
What is the slope of the graph when ?
How do you take care of that power?
First, we find the for general . Using the corollary to Theorem 4.1.3 and the quotient rule:
So, plugging in :
Let , for a differentiable function . Give a simplified formula for .
Functions of the form are relatively common. If you remember this formula, you can save yourself some time when you need to differentiate them.
After you differentiate, factor out .
Using the product rule,
A town is founded in the year 2000. After years, it has had births and deaths. Nobody enters or leaves the town except by birth or death (whoa). Give an expression for the rate the population of the town is growing.
Population growth is rate of change of population.
Population growth is rate of change of population. Population in year is given by , where is the initial population of the town. Then is the expression we're looking for, and .
It is interesting to note that the initial population does not obviously show up in this calculation. It would probably affect and , but if we know these we do not need to know to answer our question.
Find all points on the curve where the tangent line passes through .
We already know that . So the slope of at is . The tangent line to at is . This tangent line passes through if
The points are .
Evaluate $\displaystyle \lim_{y\rightarrow 0}\left( \dfrac{\sqrt{100180+y}-\sqrt{100180}}{y}\right)$ by interpreting the limit as a derivative.
Interpret it as a derivative that you know how to compute.
This limit represents the derivative computed at of the function . Since the derivative of is , then its value at is exactly .
A rectangle is growing. At time , it is a square with side length 1 metre. Its width increases at a constant rate of 2 metres per second, and its length increases at a constant rate of 5 metres per second. How fast is its area increasing at time ?
The answer is not 10 square metres per second.
square metres per second.
Let and be the width and length of the rectangle. Given in the problem is that and . Since both functions have constant slopes, both must be lines. Their slopes are given, and their intercepts are . So, and .
The area of the rectangle is , so using the product rule, the rate at which the area is increasing is square metres per second.
Let for some differentiable function . What is ?
You don't need to know or .
0
Using the product rule, , so . (Since is differentiable, exists.)
Verify that differentiating using the quotient rule gives the same answer as differentiating using the product rule and the quotient rule, when .
First expression, :
Second expresson, :
and this is exactly what we got from differentiating the first expression.
First expression, :
Second expresson, :
and this is exactly what we got from differentiating the first expression.
Find constants , so that the following function is differentiable:
In order to be differentiable, a function should be continuous. To determine the differentiability of the function at , use the definition of the derivative.
When we say a function is differentiable without specifying a range, we mean that it is differentiable over its domain. The function is differentiable when for any values of and ; it is up to us to figure out which constants make it differentiable when .
In order to be differentiable, a function must be continuous. The definition of continuity tells us that, for to be continuous at , we need . From the definition of , we see , so we need . Since , we specifically need
Now, let's consider differentiability of at . We need the following limit to exist:
In particular, we need the one-sided limits to exist and be equal:
If , then , so . If , then , so . With this in mind, we begin to evaluate the one-sided limits:
Since we take to be equal to (to ensure continuity):
So, we also need
Therefore, the values of and that make differentiable are .
Let . In Question 12, Section 3.5, we learned that .
What is ?
What is ?
Based on your answers above, guess a formula for . Check it by differentiating.
Review Pascal's Triangle.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a) Using the product rule,
(b) Using the product rule and our answer from (a),
(c) We notice that the coefficients of the derivatives of correspond to the entries in the rows of Pascal's Triangle.
In the first derivative of , the coefficients of and correspond to the entries in the second row of Pascal's Triangle.
In the second derivative of , the coefficients of , , and correspond to the entries in the third row of Pascal's Triangle.
In the third derivative of , the coefficients of , , , and correspond to the entries in the fourth row of Pascal's Triangle.
We guess that, in the fourth derivative of , the coefficients of , , , , and will correspond to the entries in the fifth row of Pascal's Triangle.
That is, we guess
This is verified by differentiating our answer from (a) using the product rule:
Spot and correct the error(s) in the following calculation.
Check signs
In the quotient rule, there is a minus, not a plus. Also, is not the same as .
The correct version is:
In the quotient rule, there is a minus, not a plus. Also, is not the same as .
The correct version is:
True or false: .
Read Lemma 4.1.14 carefully.
False
False: Lemma 4.1.14 tells us that, for a constant , . Note that the base is the variable and the exponent is a constant. In the equation given in the question, the base is a constant, and the exponent is the variable: this is the opposite of the situation where Lemma 4.1.14 applies.
We do not yet know how to differentiate . We'll learn about it in Section 3.5.
Find the derivative of .
Quotient rule
Using the quotient rule,
Differentiate .
Differentiate , where is a constant.
Since is just a constant,
So, .
For which values of is the function increasing?
Figure out where the derivative is positive.
If the derivative is positive, the function is increasing, so let's start by finding the derivative. We use the product rule (although Question 12 gives a shortcut).
Since is always positive, when . So, is increasing when .
Suppose the position of a particle at time is given by . Find the acceleration of the particle () at time .
The acceleration is given by .
The question asks for . We start our differentiation using the quotient rule:
Using the quotient rule again,
Differentiate .
A particle's position is given by
When is the particle moving in the negative direction?
To find the sign of a product, compare the signs of each factor. The function is always positive.
When is in the interval .
The question asks when is negative. So, we start by differentiating. Using the product rule:
is always positive, so is negative when and have opposite signs. This occurs when .
Let for some constant . Which value of results in ?
Use factorials, as in Example 3.4.2.
Every time we differentiate , the constant out front gets multiplied by an ever-decreasing constant, while the power decreases by one. As in Example 3.4.2, . So, if , then .
Differentiate and factor the result.
First, factor an out of the derivative. What's left over looks like a quadratic equation, if you take to be your variable, instead of .
is a polynomial:
Differentiate .
We can rewrite slightly to make every term into a power of :
Differentiate .
First simplify. Don't be confused by the role reversal of and : is just the name of the function , which is a function of the variable . You are to differentiate with respect to .
We could use the product rule here, but it's easier to simplify first. Don't be confused by the role reversal of and : is the name of the function, and is the variable.
Differentiate .
We've already seen that , but if you forget this formula it is easy to figure out: , so .
Using the quotient rule:
Compute the derivative of .
We use quotient rule:
What is , when ?
You don't need to multiply through.
7
Instead of multiplying to get our usual form of this polynomial, we can use the product rule. If and , then
and . Then
Differentiate .
You can use the quotient rule.
Using the quotient rule,
Compute the derivative of
We use quotient rule:
Compute the derivative of .
We use quotient rule:
Compute the derivative of .
We use quotient rule:
For what values of does the derivative of exist? Explain your answer.
There are two pieces of the given function that could cause problems.
The derivative of the function is
The derivative is undefined if either or (since the square-root is undefined for and the denominator is zero when . Putting this together — the derivative exists for .
The derivative of the function is
The derivative is undefined if either or (since the square-root is undefined for and the denominator is zero when . Putting this together — the derivative exists for .
Differentiate .
$\left(\frac{3}{5}{x}^{\frac{-4}{5}}+5{x}^{\frac{-2}{3}}\right)\left(3x^2+8x-5\right)+ \left(3\sqrt[5]{x}+15\sqrt[3]{x}+8\right)\left(6x+8\right)$
Using the product rule seems faster than expanding.
Differentiate .
Simplify first
To avoid the quotient rule, we can divide through the denominator:
Now, product rule:
(If you simplified differently, or used the quotient rule, you probably came up with a different-looking answer. There is only one derivative, though, so all correct answers will look the same after sufficient algebraic manipulation.)
Let , where , , , and are nonzero constants. What is the smallest integer so that for all ?
Differentiate a few times until you get zero, remembering that , , , and are all constants.
We differentiate using the power rule.
In the above work, remember that , , , and are all constants. Since they are nonzero constants, . So, the fourth derivative is the first derivative to be identically zero: .
Let .
Show that is differentiable at , and find .
Find the second derivative of . Explicitly state, with justification, the point(s) at which does not exist, if any.
You can re-write this function as a piecewise function, with branches and . To figure out the derivatives at , use the definition of a derivative.
(a) In order to make a little more tractable, let's change the format. Since $|x|=\left{\begin{array}{rl} x&x \geq 0\ -x&x<0 \end{array}\right.$, then:
Now, we turn to the definition of the derivative to figure out whether exists.
Since looks different to the left and right of 0, in order to evaluate this limit, we look at the corresponding one-sided limits. Note that when approaches 0 from the right, so . By contrast, when approaches 0 from the left, so .
Since both one-sided limits exist and are equal to 0,
and so is differentiable at and .
(b) From (a), and
So,
Then, we know the second derivative of everywhere except at :
So, whenever , exists. To investigate the differentiability of when , again we turn to the definition of a derivative. If
exists, then exists.
Since behaves differently when is greater than or less than zero, we look at the one-sided limits.
Since the one-sided limits do not agree,
So, does not exist. Now we have a complete picture of :
(a) In order to make a little more tractable, let's change the format. Since $|x|=\left{\begin{array}{rl} x&x \geq 0\ -x&x<0 \end{array}\right.$, then:
Now, we turn to the definition of the derivative to figure out whether exists.
Since looks different to the left and right of 0, in order to evaluate this limit, we look at the corresponding one-sided limits. Note that when approaches 0 from the right, so . By contrast, when approaches 0 from the left, so .
Since both one-sided limits exist and are equal to 0,
and so is differentiable at and .
(b) From (a), and
So,
Then, we know the second derivative of everywhere except at :
So, whenever , exists. To investigate the differentiability of when , again we turn to the definition of a derivative. If
exists, then exists.
Since behaves differently when is greater than or less than zero, we look at the one-sided limits.
Since the one-sided limits do not agree,
So, does not exist. Now we have a complete picture of :
Find an equation of a line that is tangent to both of the curves and (at different points).
Let be the slope of such a tangent line, and let and be the points where the tangent line is tangent to the two curves, respectively. There are three equations fulfils: it has the same slope as the curves at the given points, and it is the slope of the line passing through the points and .
Denote by the slope of the common tangent, by the point of tangency with , and by the point of tangency with . Then we must have
From the “” equations we get , and
An equation of the common tangent is .
Find all lines that are tangent to both of the curves and . Illustrate your answer with a sketch.
A line has equation , for some constants and . What has to be true for to be tangent to the first curve at the point , and to the second at the point ?
and
The line is tangent to at if
The same line is tangent to at if
For the line to be simultaneously tangent to the two parabolas we need
Substituting into gives or or . The corresponding values of the other parameters are , and . The two lines are and .
Evaluate $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to 2}\left( \dfrac{x^{2015}-2^{2015}}{x-2}\right).$
Compare this to one of the forms given in the text for the definition of the derivative.
This limit represents the derivative computed at of the function . To see this, simply use the definition of the derivative at with :
Since the derivative of is , then its value at is exactly .
From the UBC Math 100 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.