Limits & Continuity · Topic 02 of 23
Introduction to Limits
says gets as close to as demanded once is close enough to — with , so never matters. The limit exists exactly when both one-sided limits exist and agree; a jump, a blow-up to or an oscillation means it does not, and the - definition makes all of this precise.
Key ideas
5 things to remember- 1
The limit never looks at
means stays as close to as demanded once is close enough to , with . Whether equals , differs from it, or is undefined changes nothing.
- 2
Both one-sided limits must agree
uses only ; only . exactly when both equal . At a domain endpoint ( at ) only the one-sided limit is posed.
- 3
Three ways a limit fails
A jump (one-sided limits differ), a blow-up ( or at : a vertical asymptote), or an oscillation ( at sweeps forever). Writing records how it fails; is not a number.
- 4
Circles give limits, dots give values
Slide a finger along the curve from the left, then from the right, and report the height each branch heads toward — an open circle still counts. A solid dot gives only; never jump to it.
- 5
-: every tolerance must be met
For every there must be a with . may depend on and , never on . One for one proves nothing.
Formulas
What to have memorisedTwo-sided from one-sided
Both must exist and agree; either failure kills the two-sided limit. At a domain endpoint only one side is posed.
- definition of
is the opponent's vertical tolerance; is your horizontal reply, written in terms of only.
One-sided limit, precisely
Left-hand: use instead. The superscript names the side comes from, not the sign of .
for a linear function
Because . If the function is constant and any works.
with a nuisance factor
For : restrict first, bound the other factor, then take the minimum.
Infinite limit
A description of failure — the limit does not exist, because is not a real number.
Showing a limit does not exist
Two families of inputs whose outputs stay apart: for take , .
Write an $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ proof
The steps, in order- 1
Scratch work first: simplify until appears as a factor — for a line, for .
- 2
If the other factor still contains , agree : then pins to an interval and bounds that factor by a constant .
- 3
Choose : for a line, otherwise. It may involve and , never .
- 4
Write the proof: "Let . Put . Suppose . Then ."
- 5
Close with "since was arbitrary". For , swap in: given , find forcing .
Watch out
The mistakes that cost marks✗ Wrong
, automatically
✓ Right
The limit never inspects . That equation is continuity at — a property to verify, not part of the definition.
Why: may differ from the limit or not exist at all.
✗ Wrong
", so the limit exists."
✓ Right
It does not exist; "" only records how it fails.
Why: is not a real number, and existence needs a real .
✗ Wrong
✓ Right
may not mention . Restrict , bound , then take .
Why: is quantified after ; must be fixed before is chosen.
✗ Wrong
"The right-hand limit is , so ."
✓ Right
Both one-sided limits must exist and agree — unless is a domain endpoint, where only one side is posed.
✗ Wrong
at gives , so the limit is
✓ Right
Those samples all sit on zeros of sine; does not exist.
Why: A table samples finitely many points; a limit is a claim about all of them.
✗ Wrong
"For , works. QED."
✓ Right
Give as a formula in () and run the argument for an arbitrary .
Why: The definition is a promise about every tolerance, not one convenient one.
Quick check
Commit to an answer before you reveal one- Q1easy
Let Find (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) . What is the relationship between (c) and (d)?
Hint
Each one-sided limit uses only the formula valid on its side of ; the value at is a separate question.
Show answer
Answer
(a) (b) (c) (d) . The limit exists but differs from the value: a removable discontinuity.
Steps
(a) For the rule is : .
(b) For the rule is : .
(c) Both one-sided limits exist and equal , so .
(d) The middle line applies only at : .
The limit is computed from and never sees , so is perfectly legal. Redefining would make continuous there — that is why the discontinuity is called removable.
- Q2easy
The graph of on has three pieces: a segment from the solid point up to an open circle at ; a single solid dot at ; a segment from an open circle at up to the solid point . Find , , , and . Why is not asked?
Hint
An open circle still tells you the height a branch is heading toward; only the solid dot gives a value.
Show answer
Answer
; ; does not exist (jump); ; . Nothing is defined for , so only the one-sided limit is meaningful there.
Steps
Left piece: through and , slope , so for . Right piece: through and , so for .
— the circle at being open is irrelevant. . The one-sided limits differ, so does not exist. from the solid dot: left limit, right limit and value are three independent numbers.
. A two-sided limit needs defined on both sides of ; there is no graph for , so only the left-hand limit is posed.
- Q3medium
Let for and for , where is a constant. (a) Find every for which exists, and give the limit. (b) For that , compare with the limit. (c) If , find both one-sided limits and describe how the limit fails.
Hint
Write each one-sided limit as an expression in , then force them to agree.
Show answer
Answer
(a) only; the limit is . (b) , equal to the limit. (c) Left limit , right limit : a jump of size .
Steps
(a) and . The two-sided limit exists exactly when and then both sides equal .
(b) The second rule covers : . Limit equals value, so is continuous at when .
(c) With : for and for , so the one-sided limits are and . Both exist but disagree — a jump, not a blow-up or an oscillation.
- Q4medium
Let and . (a) Find and ; what does this say about ? (b) Prove from the definition that . (c) Does exist?
Hint
For (a) track the sign of on each side. For (b) solve for .
Show answer
Answer
(a) and ; does not exist (vertical asymptote). (b) works. (c) No — "" describes the failure; is not a real number.
Steps
(a) As , is negative and tiny, so ; as it is positive and tiny, so . Neither one-sided limit is a real number, and they run to opposite infinities, so does not exist; is a vertical asymptote.
(b) Let and put . If then Since was arbitrary, .
(c) No. Existence requires a real ; the symbol records that exceeds every bound near .
- Q5medium
Let . (a) Find the largest such that implies . (b) Repeat for . (c) Give as a formula in an arbitrary and write the full proof that .
Hint
Simplify first; for a linear function it is a constant times .
Show answer
Answer
(a) (b) (c) .
Steps
.
(a) , so the largest is (any smaller positive also works). (b) : .
(c) Let be given. Put . Suppose . Then Since was arbitrary, . Check: gives , matching (a).
- Q6hard
Prove from the - definition that . Say exactly where the preliminary restriction is used and why it is needed.
Hint
Factor . You control directly; the factor must be bounded first.
Show answer
Answer
. The restriction is used only to get ; without it could be arbitrarily large.
Steps
Scratch: . If then , so and .
Proof. Let . Put and suppose . Since , . Since , . Hence Since was arbitrary, .
The restriction is used only for the bound . Without it could be far from , making huge and the product large even when is small. Any restriction works: gives and .
On the exam
How this topic is marked"Find the limit or explain why it does not exist" is marked on the reason: write both one-sided values, then "they differ, so the limit does not exist" — or name the blow-up or oscillation.
An - proof is marked line by line: "Let ", as a formula in , "suppose ", then a chain of inequalities ending in . Scratch work alone earns nothing.
Never write without a reason. Here the reason is "both one-sided limits equal "; later it will be continuity.
Keep going
Practise more
Read next
Stuck on this topic?
One session with a tutor who teaches it every term usually settles it.
Book a session