The function is shown. Select all options below that describe its derivative, :
(a) constant (b) increasing
(c) decreasing
(d) always positive
(e) always negative
Introduction to the derivative
36 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
The function is shown. Select all options below that describe its derivative, :
(a) constant (b) increasing
(c) decreasing
(d) always positive
(e) always negative
What are the properties of when is a line?
(a), (d)
The function shown is a line, so it has a constant slope–(a) . Since the function is always increasing, is always positive, so also (d) holds. Remark: it does not matter that the function itself is sometimes negative; the slope is always positive because the function is always increasing. Also, since the slope is constant, is neither increasing nor decreasing: it is the function that is increasing, not its derivative.
The function is shown. Select all options below that describe its derivative, :
(a) constant (b) increasing
(c) decreasing
(d) always positive
(e) always negative
Be very careful not to confuse and .
(e)
The function is always decreasing, so is always negative, option (e). However, the function alternates between being more and less steep, so alternates between increasing and decreasing several times, and no other options hold.
Remark: is always positive, but (d) does not hold!
The function is shown. Select all options below that describe its derivative, :
(a) constant (b) increasing
(c) decreasing
(d) always positive
(e) always negative
Be very careful not to confuse and .
(b)
At the left end of the graph, is decreasing rapidly, so is a strongly negative number. Then as we move towards , decreases less rapidly, so is a less strongly negative number. As we pass 0, increases, so is a positive number. As we move to the right, increases more and more rapidly, so is an increasing positive number. This description tells us that increases for the entire range shown. So (b) holds, but not (a) or (c). Since is negative to the left of the axis, and positive to the right of it, also (d) and (e) do not hold.
State, in terms of a limit, what it means for to be differentiable at .
By definition, is differentiable at if the limit
exists.
By definition, is differentiable at if the limit
exists.
For which values of does not exist?
The slope has to look “the same" from the left and the right.
and
does not exist, because to the left of the slope is a pretty big positive number (looks like around ) and to the right the slope is . Since the derivative involves a limit, that limit needs to match the limit from the left and the limit from the right. The sharp angle made by the graph at indicates that the left and right limits do not match, so the derivative does not exist.
also does not exist. One way to see this is to notice that the function is discontinuous here. More viscerally, note that , so as we take secant lines with one endpoint , and the other endpoint just to the right of , we get slopes that are more and more strongly negative, as shown in the picture below. If we take the limit of the slopes of these secant lines as goes to from the right, we get . (This certainly doesn't match the slope from the left, which is .)
At , there is some kind of “change" in the graph; however, it is a smooth curve, so the derivative exists here.
Suppose is a function defined at with
True or false: .
Use the definition of the derivative, and what you know about limits.
True. (Contrast to Question 7.)
True. The definition of the derivative tells us that
if it exists. We know from our work with limits that if both one-sided limits
and exist and are equal to each other, then exists and has the same value as the one-sided limits. So, since the one-sided limits exist and are equal to one, we conclude exists and is equal to one.
Suppose is a function defined at with
True or false: .
Consider continuity.
In general, false. (Contrast to Question 6.)
In general, this is false. The key problem that can arise is that might not be continuous at . One example is the function
where whenever (so in particular, ) but does not exist.
There are two ways to see that does not exist. One is to notice that is not continuous at .
Another way to see that does not exist is to use the definition of the derivative. Remember, in order for a limit to exist, both one-sided limits must exist. Let's consider the limit from the left. If , then , so is equal to (not ).
In particular, this limit does not exist. Since the one-sided limit does not exist,
and so does not exist.
Suppose is a function, with measured in seconds, and measured in metres. What are the units of ?
Look at the definition of the derivative. Your answer will be a fraction.
metres per second
Using the definition of the derivative,
The units of the numerator are meters, and the units of the denominator are seconds (since the denominator comes from the change in the input of the function). So, the units of are metres per second.
Remark: we learned that the derivative of a position function gives velocity. In this example, the position is given in metres, and the velocity is measured in metres per second.
Use the definition of the derivative to find the equation of the tangent line to the curve at the point .
You need a point (given), and a slope (derivative).
, or
We can use point-slope form to get the equation of the line, if we have a point and its slope. The point is given: . The slope is the derivative:
So our slope is 3, which gives a line of equation .
Use the definition of the derivative to find the derivative of .
You'll need to add some fractions.
We set up the definition of the derivative.
Let . Using the definition of the derivative, show that is differentiable at .
You don't have to take the limit from the left and right separately–things will cancel nicely.
By definition
In particular, the limit exists, so the derivative exists (and is equal to zero).
By definition
In particular, the limit exists, so the derivative exists (and is equal to zero).
Use the definition of the derivative to compute the derivative of the function .
You might have to add fractions
We set up the definition of the derivative.
Use the definition of the derivative to compute the derivative of the function .
Use the definition of the derivative to find the slope of the tangent line to the curve
at the point .
Your limit should be easy.
1
The slope of the tangent line is the derivative. We set this up using the same definition of the derivative that we always do. This limit is hard to take for general , but easy when .
So, the slope of the tangent line is 1.
Compute the derivative of directly from the definition.
add fractions
Find the values of the constants and for which
is differentiable everywhere.
Remark: In the text, you have already learned the derivatives of and . In this question, you are only asked to find the values of and —not to justify how you got them—so you don't have to use the definition of the derivative. However, on an exam, you might be asked to justify your answer, in which case you would show how to differentiate the two branches of using the definition of a derivative.
For to be differentiable at , two things must be true: it must be continuous at , and the derivative from the right must equal the derivative from the left.
,
When is not equal to 2, then the function is differentiable– the only place we have to worry about is when is exactly 2.
In order for to be differentiable at , it must also be continuous at . This forces or
In order for a limit to exist, the left- and right-hand limits must exist and be equal to each other. Since a derivative is a limit, in order for to be differentiable at , the left hand derivative of at must be the same as the right hand derivative of at . Since is a line, its derivative is everywhere. We've already seen the derivative of is , so we need
So, the values of and that makes differentiable everywhere are and .
Use the definition of the derivative to compute if . Where does exist?
After you plug in to the definition of a derivative, you'll want to multiply and divide by the conjugate .
when ; does not exist when .
We plug in to the definition of a derivative. To evaluate the limit, we multiply and divide by the conjugate of the numerator, then simplify.
The domain of the function is . In particular, is defined when . However, is not defined when , so only exists over .
Remark: , so the tangent line to at the point has a vertical slope.
Use the definition of the derivative to find the velocity of an object whose position is given by the function .
When you're finding the derivative, you'll need to cancel a lot on the numerator, which you can do by expanding the polynomials.
Recall the velocity is exactly the derivative.
So, the velocity is given by .
Determine whether the derivative of following function exists at .
You must justify your answer using the definition of a derivative.
You'll need to look at limits from the left and right. The fact that is useful for your computation. Recall that if then .
No, it does not.
The function is differentiable at if the following limit:
exists (note that we used the fact that as per the definition of the first branch which includes the point ). We start by computing the left limit. For this computation, recall that if then .
Now, from the right:
Since the limit from the left does not equal the limit from the right, the derivative does not exist at .
Determine whether the derivative of the following function exists at
You must justify your answer using the definition of a derivative.
You'll need to look at limits from the left and right. The fact that is useful for your computation.
No, it does not.
The function is differentiable at if the following limit:
exists (note that we used the fact that as per the definition of the first branch which includes the point ).
We start by computing the left limit.
Now, from the right:
Since the limit from the left does not equal the limit from the right, the derivative does not exist at .
Determine whether the derivative of the following function exists at
You must justify your answer using the definition of a derivative.
You'll need to look at limits from the left and right. The fact that is useful for your computation.
Yes, it is.
The function is differentiable at if the following limit:
exists (note that we used the fact that as per the definition of the first branch which includes the point ). We compute left and right limits; so
and
This last limit equals (see Question 23 in 2.1.1 for a similar example).
Since the left and right limits match (they're both equal to ), we conclude that indeed is differentiable at (and its derivative at is actually equal to ).
Determine whether the derivative of the following function exists at
You must justify your answer using the definition of a derivative.
You'll need to look at limits from the left and right. The fact that is useful for your computation.
Yes, it is.
The function is differentiable at if the following limit:
exists (note that we used the fact that as per the definition of the first branch which includes the point ). We compute left and right limits; so
and
For this last limit, note that , so . That is, the `sine' part of the product can only make the part closer to 0, not farther from 0. Since , then also .
Since the left and right limits match (they're both equal to ), we conclude that indeed is differentiable at (and its derivative at is actually equal to ).
Sketch a function with that takes the following values:
Remark: you can't always guess the behaviour of a function from its points, even if the points seem to be making a clear pattern.
There's lots of room between and ; see what you can do with it.
Many answers are possible; here is one.
Many answers are possible; here is one.
The key is to realize that the few points you're given suggest a pattern, but don't guarantee it. You only know nine points; anything can happen in between.
Let , for some functions and whose derivatives exist. Use limit laws and the definition of a derivative to show that .
Remark: this is called the sum rule, and we'll learn more about it in Lemma 4.1.1.
Set up your usual limit, then split it into two pieces
At step (), we use the limit law that , as long as and exist. Because the problem states that and exist, we know that and $\displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}$ exist, so our work is valid.
At step (), we use the limit law that , as long as and exist. Because the problem states that and exist, we know that and $\displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}$ exist, so our work is valid.
Let , , and .
Find and .
Find .
Is ?
In Theorem 4.1.3, you'll learn a rule for calculating the derivative of a product of two functions.
You don't need the definition of the derivative for a line.
(a) and (b) (c) no
(a) Since and are straight lines, we don't need the definition of the derivative (although you can use it if you like). and .
(b) , so is not a line: we use the definition of a derivative to find .
(c) No, . In general, the derivative of a product is not the same as the derivative of the functions being multiplied.
There are two distinct straight lines that pass through the point and are tangent to the curve . Find equations for these two lines.
Remark: the point does not lie on the curve .
A generic point on the curve has coordinates . In terms of , what is the equation of the tangent line to the curve at the point ? What does it mean for to be on that line?
and
We know that . So, if we choose a point on the curve , then the tangent line to the curve at that point has slope . That is, the tangent line has equation
So, if is on the tangent line, then
So, the tangent lines are
For which values of is the function
differentiable at 0?
Remember for a constant ,
Using the definition of the derivative, is differentiable at if and only if
exists. In particular, this means is differentiable at if and only if both one-sided limits exist and are equal to each other.
When , , so
So, is differentiable at if and only if
To evaluate the limit above, we note and, when , , so
We will spend the rest of this solution evaluating the limit above for different values of , to find when it is equal to zero and when it is not. Let's consider the different values that could be taken by .
If , then , so for all values of . Then
(Recall that the function oscillates faster and faster as goes to 0. We first saw this behaviour in Example 2.1.5 in the text.)
If , then , so . (Since we have a negative exponent, we are in effect dividing by a smaller and smaller positive number. For example, if , then .) Since goes back and forth between one and negative one,
since as goes to 0, the function oscillates between positive and negative numbers of ever-increasing magnitude.
If , then , so . Although oscillates wildly near , it is bounded by and . So, it can't stop the `going to zero' behaviour of . (Indeed, is either equal to , or even closer to 0 than alone.) So,
In the above cases, we learned
when , and
when .
So, is differentiable at if and only if .
Suppose gives the height at time of the water at a dam, where the units of are hours and the units of are meters.
What is the physical interpretation of the slope of the secant line through the points and ?
What is the physical interpretation of the slope of the tangent line to the curve at the point ?
Think about units.
(a) The average rate of change of the height of the water over the single day starting at , measured in .
(b) The instantaneous rate of change of the height of the water at the time .
(a) The slope of the secant line is ; this is the change in height over the first day divided by the number of hours in the first day. So, it is the average rate of change of the height over the first day, measured in meters per hour.
(b) Consider (a). The secant line gives the average rate of change of the height of the dam; as we let the second point of the secant line get closer and closer to , its slope approximates the instantaneous rate of change of the height of the water. So the slope of the tangent line is the instantaneous rate of change of the height of the water at the time , measured in .
Suppose is a function that gives the profit generated by selling widgets. What is the practical interpretation of ?
Profit per additional widget sold, when widgets are being sold. This is called the marginal profit per widget, when widgets are being sold.
, or the difference in profit caused by the sale of the widget. So, is the profit from the widget. That is, is the profit per additional widget sold, when widgets are being sold. This is called the marginal profit per widget, when widgets are being sold.
gives the temperature of water at a particular location metres below the surface. What is the physical interpretation of ? Would you expect the magnitude of to be larger when is near 0, or when is very large?
measures how quickly the temperature is changing per unit change of depth, measured in degrees per metre. will probably be largest when is near zero, unless there are hot springs or other underwater heat sources.
How quickly the temperature is changing per unit change of depth, measured in degrees per metre. In an ordinary body of water, the temperature near the surface () is pretty variable, depending on the sun, but deep down it is more stable (unless there are heat sources). So, one might reasonably expect that is larger when is near 0.
gives the calories in grams of a particular dish. What does describe?
Calories per additional gram, when there are grams.
, which is the number of calories in grams minus the number of calories in grams. This is the number of calories per additional gram, when there are grams.
The velocity of a moving object at time is given by . What is ?
The acceleration of the object.
The rate of change of velocity is acceleration. (If your velocity is increasing, you're accelerating; if your velocity is decreasing, you have negative acceleration.)
The function gives the temperature in degrees Celsius of a cup of water after joules of heat have been added. What is ?
Degrees Celsius temperature change per joule of heat added. (This is closely related to heat capacity and to specific heat — there's a nice explanation of this on Wikipedia.)
The rate of change in this case will be the relationship between the heat added and the temperature change. , or the change in temperature after the application of one joule. (This is closely related to heat capacity and to specific heat — there's a nice explanation of this on Wikipedia.)
A population of bacteria, left for a fixed amount of time at temperature , grows to individuals. Interpret .
Number of bacteria added per degree. That is: the number of extra bacteria (possibly negative) that will exist in the population by raising the temperature by one degree.
As usual, it is instructive to think about the definition of the derivative:
This is the difference in population between two hypothetical populations, raised one degree in temperature apart. So, it is the number of extra individuals that exist in the hotter experiment (with the understanding that this number could be negative, as one would expect in conditions that are hotter than the bacteria prefer). So is the number of bacteria added to the colony per degree.
You hammer a small nail into a wooden wagon wheel. gives the number of rotations the nail has undergone seconds after the wagon started to roll. Give an equation for how quickly the nail is rotating, measured in degrees per second.
There are 360 degrees in one rotation.
is the rate at which the wheel is rotating measured in rotations per second. To convert to degrees, we multiply by 360: .
A population of bacteria, left for a fixed amount of time at temperature , grows to individuals. There is one ideal temperature where the bacteria population grows largest, and the closer the sample is to that temperature, the larger the population is (unless the temperature is so extreme that it causes all the bacteria to die by freezing or boiling). How will tell you whether you are colder or hotter than the ideal temperature?
was discussed in Question 34.
If is positive, your sample is below the ideal temperature, and if is negative, your sample is above the ideal temperature. If , you don't know whether the sample is exactly at the ideal temperature, or way above or below it with no living bacteria.
If is positive, your sample is below the ideal temperature, because adding heat increases the population. If is negative, your sample is above the ideal temperature, because adding heat decreases the population. If , then adding a little bit of heat doesn't change the population, but it's unclear why this is. Perhaps your sample is deeply frozen, and adding heat doesn't change the fact that your population is 0. Perhaps your sample is boiling, and again, changing the heat a little will keep the population constant at “none." But also, at the ideal temperature, you would expect . This is best seen by noting in the curve below, the tangent line is horizontal at the peak.
From the UBC Math 100 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.