Suppose x→alimf(x)=0 and
x→alimg(x)=0. Which of the following limits can you compute, given this information?
x→alim2f(x)
x→alimf(x)2
x→alimg(x)f(x)
x→alimf(x)g(x)
Answer+
(a) and (d)
Full solution+
Zeroes cause a problem when they show up in the denominator, so we can only compute
(a) and (d). (Both these limits are zero.) Be careful: there is no such rule as “zero divided by zero is one," or “zero divided by zero is zero."
Give two functions f(x) and g(x) that satisfy x→3limf(x)=x→3limg(x)=0 and x→3limg(x)f(x)=10.
Hint+
Try to make two functions with factors that will cancel.
Answer+
There are many possible answers; one is f(x)=10(x−3), g(x)=x−3.
Full solution+
The statement x→3limg(x)f(x)=10 tells us that, as x gets very close to 3, f(x) is 10 times as large as g(x). We notice that if f(x)=10g(x), then g(x)f(x)=10, so x→limg(x)f(x)=10 wherever f and g exist. So it's enough to find a function g(x) that has limit 0 at 3. Such a function is (for example) g(x)=x−3. So, we take f(x)=10(x−3) and g(x)=x−3. It is easy now to check that x→3limf(x)=x→3limg(x)=0 and x→3limg(x)f(x)=x→3limx−310(x−3)=x→3lim10=10.
Give two functions f(x) and g(x) that satisfy x→3limf(x)=x→3limg(x)=0 and x→3limg(x)f(x)=0.
Hint+
Try to make g(x) cancel out.
Answer+
There are many possible answers; one is
f(x)=(x−3)2 and g(x)=x−3. Another is f(x)=0 and g(x)=x−3.
Full solution+
As we saw in Question 2, x−3 is a function with limit 0 at x=3. So one way of thinking about this question is to try choosing f(x) so that g(x)f(x)=g(x)=x−3 too, which leads us to the solution f(x)=(x−3)2 and g(x)=x−3. This is one of many, many possible answers.
Another way of thinking about this problem is that f(x) should go to 0 “more strongly" than g(x) when x approaches 3. One way of a function going to 0 really strongly is to make that function identically zero. So we can set f(x)=0 and g(x)=x−3. Now g(x)f(x) is equal to 0 whenever x=3, and is undefined at x=3. Since the limit as x goes to three does not take into account the value of the function at 3, we have x→3limg(x)f(x)=0.
Give two functions f(x) and g(x) that satisfy x→3limf(x)=x→3limg(x)=0 and x→3limg(x)f(x)=∞.
Answer+
There are many possible answers; one is
f(x)=x−3, g(x)=(x−3)3.
Full solution+
One way to start this problem is to remember x→0limx21=∞. (Using x21 as opposed to x1 is important, since x→0limx1 does not exist.) Then by “shifting" by three, we find x→3lim(x−3)21=∞. So it is enough to arrange that g(x)f(x)=(x−3)21. We can achieve this with f(x)=x−3 and g(x)=(x−3)3, and maintain x→3limf(x)=x→3limg(x)=0. Again, this is one of many possible solutions.
Any real number; positive infinity; negative infinity; does not exist.
Full solution+
Any real number; positive infinity; negative infinity; does not exist.
This is an important thing to remember: often, people see limits that look like 00 and think that the limit must be 1, or 0, or infinite. In fact, this limit could be anything–it depends on the relationship between f and g.
Questions 2 and 3 show us examples where the limit is 10 and 0; they can easily be modified to make the limit any real number.
Question 4 show us an example where the limit is ∞; it can easily be modified to make the limit −∞ or DNE.
Stage 2 · Procedural
For Questions 6 through 38, evaluate the given limits.
Break it up into smaller pieces, evaluate the limits of the pieces.
Answer+
6
Full solution+
Since we're not doing anything dodgy like putting 0 in the denominator,
$\displaystyle\lim_{y \rightarrow 0} \dfrac{(y+1)(y+2)(y+3)}{\cos y}
=\dfrac{(0+1)(0+2)(0+3)}{\cos 0}=\dfrac{6}{1}=6$.
First find the limit of the “inside" function, x+24x−2.
Answer+
16
Full solution+
Since the limits of the numerator and denominator exist, and since the limit of the denominator is nonzero:
$\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 3} \left(\dfrac{4x-2}{x+2}\right)^4 =
\left(\dfrac{4(3)-2}{3+2}\right)^4=16$
We're multiplying cos(x3) by a number that approaches 0 (but since we're taking a limit, we don't actually consider what happens when x=0).
For any nonzero value of x (whether or not it's close to 0), cos(x3)≤1. So, its magnitude never gets very large. Since it's multiplied by something going to 0, the entire function will go to 0.
We can also see this by graphing the function. Note that cos(x3) keeps cycling from 1, to 0, to -1, back to 0, etc, as x approaches 0.
When cos(x3)=1, −x2cosx3=−x2;
when cos(x3)=0, −x2cosx3=0; and
when cos(x3)=−1, −x2cosx3=x2.
So, we imagine the function x2cos(x3) wiggling back and forth between x2 and −x2:
For x very close to 0, then, also −x2cos(x3) is very close to 0. That is,
x→0lim−x2cos(x3)=0.
For any (nonzero) value of x, 0≤1sin2(x1)≤1. So when we multiply it by a number, that number either stays the same or gets closer to 0.
In particular, when we multiply x by sin2(x1), the result is either x itself, or something even closer to 0 than x was originally. Since x is approaching 0, xsin2(x1) is approaching 0 as well. That is, x→0limxsin2(x1)=0.
Another way to see this is by graphing. The factor sin2(x1)≤1 cycles between 0 and 1, so the function xsin2(x1) cycles between 0 and x:
When we plug w=5 in to the numerator and denominator, we find that each becomes zero. Since we can't divide by zero, we have to dig a little deeper. When a polynomial has a root, that also means it has a factor: we can factor (w−5) out of the top. That lets us cancel:
Note that the function (w−5)(w−1)2w2−50 is NOT defined at w=5, while the function (w−1)2(w+5) IS defined at w=5; so strictly speaking, these two functions are not equal. However, for every value of w that is not 5, the functions are the same, so their limits are equal. Furthermore, the limit of the second function is quite easy to calculate, since we've eliminated the zero in the denominator:
$\displaystyle\lim_{w \rightarrow 5} \dfrac{2(w+5)}{(w-1)}
=\dfrac{2(5+5)}{5-1}=5.$
So w→5lim(w−5)(w−1)2w2−50=w→5lim(w−1)2(w+5)=5.
When we plug in r=−5 to the denominator, we find that it becomes 0, so we need to dig deeper. The numerator is not zero, so cancelling is out. Notice that the denominator is factorable: r2+10r+25=(r+5)2. As r approaches −5 from either side, the denominator gets very close to zero, but stays positive. The numerator gets very close to −5. So, as r gets closer to −5, we have something close to −5 divided by a very small, positive number. Since the denominator is small, the fraction will have a large magnitude; since the numerator is negative and the denominator is positive, the fraction will be negative. So,
r→−5limr2+10r+25r=−∞
First, we find x→−1lim3x+3x3+x2+x+1. When we plug in x=−1 to the top and the bottom, both become zero. In a polynomial, where there is a root, there is a factor, so this tells us we can factor out (x+1) from both the top and the bottom. It's pretty easy to see how to do this in the bottom. For the top, if you're having a hard time, one factoring method (of many) to try is long division of polynomials; another is to factor out (x+1) from the first two terms and the last two terms. (Detailed examples of long division are given in Appendix A.16 and Examples 1.10.2 and 1.10.3 of CLP–2.)
One thing to note here is that the function 3x+3x3+x2+x+1 is not defined at x=−1 (because we can't divide by zero). So we replaced it with the function
3x2+1, which IS defined at x=−1. These functions only differ at x=−1; they are the same at every other point. That is why we can use the second function to find the limit of the first function.
Now we're ready to find the actual limit asked in the problem:
When we plug x=0 into the denominator, we get 0, which means we need to look harder. The numerator is not zero, so we won't be able to cancel our problems away. Let's factor to make things clearer.
3x5−5x3x2+2x+1=x3(3x2−5)(x+1)2
As x gets close to 0, the numerator is close to 1; the term (3x2−5) is negative; and the sign of x3 depends on the direction we're approaching 0 from. Since we're dividing a numerator that is very close to 1 by something that's getting very close to 0, the magnitude of the fraction is getting bigger and bigger without bound. Since the sign of the fraction flips depending on whether we are using numbers slightly bigger than 0, or slightly smaller than 0, that means the one-sided limits are ∞ and −∞, respectively.
(In particular, x→0−lim3x5−5x3x2+2x+1=∞ and x→0+lim3x5−5x3x2+2x+1=−∞.) Since the one-sided limits don't agree, the limit does not exist.
t→7limt2−14t+49t2x2+2tx+1, where x is a positive constant
Hint+
Look for perfect squares
Answer+
∞
Full solution+
As usual, we first try plugging in t=7, but the denominator is 0, so we need to think harder. The top and bottom are both squares, so let's go ahead and factor:
$\dfrac{t^2x^2+2tx+1}{t^2-14t+49}=
\dfrac{(tx+1)^2}{(t-7)^2}$.
Since x is positive, the numerator is nonzero. Also, the numerator is positive near t=7. So, we have something positive and nonzero on the top, and we divide it by the bottom, which is positive and getting closer and closer to zero. The quotient is always positive near t=7, and it is growing in magnitude without bound, so
t→7limt2−14t+49t2x2+2tx+1=∞.
Remark: there is an important reason we specified that x must be a positive constant. Suppose x were −71 (which is negative
and so was not allowed in the question posed). In this case, we would have
Think about what effect changing d has on the function x5−32x+15.
Answer+
x5−32x+15
Full solution+
The function whose limit we are taking does not depend on d. Since x is a constant, x5−32x+15 is also a constant–it's just some number, that doesn't change, regardless of what d does. So
d→0limx5−32x+15=x5−32x+15.
There's a lot going on inside that sine function... and we don't have to care about any of it. No matter what horrible thing we put inside a sine function, the sine function will spit out a number between −1 and 1. So that means the entire function is somewhere between (x−1)2 and −(x−1)2. Since (x−1)2 is approaching 0, the entire function is approaching 0.
That is, x→1lim(x−1)2sin[(x2−2x+1x2−3x+2)2+15]=0.
What can you do to safely ignore the sine function?
Answer+
0
Full solution+
Since −1≤sinx≤1 for all values of x, when we multiply a number by this function, it causes the magnitude (absolute value) of that number to either be the same, or closer to 0.
Since x→0limx1/101 is already 0, the limit doesn't change when we multiply it by the sine part.
If you're looking at the hints for this one, it's probably easier than you think.
Answer+
0
Full solution+
When we plug in x=5 to the top and the bottom, both limits exist, and the bottom is nonzero. So
$\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 5} \dfrac{(x-5)^2}{x+5}=
\dfrac{0}{10}=0$.
You'll want to simplify this, since t=21 is not in the domain of the function. One way to start your simplification is to add the fractions in the numerator by finding a common denominator.
Answer+
−932
Full solution+
Since we can't plug in t=21, we'll simplify. One way to start is to add the fractions in the numerator. We'll need a common demoninator, such as 3t2(t2−1).
Since we cancelled out the term that was causing the numerator and denominator to be zero when t=21, now t=21 is in the domain of our function, so we simply plug it in:
Is anything weird happening to this function at x=0?
Answer+
−29
Full solution+
Note that x=0 is in the domain of our function, and nothing “weird" is happening there: we aren't dividing by zero, or taking the square root of a negative number, or joining two pieces of a piecewise-defined function. So, as x gets extremely close to zero, ∣x∣+25x−9 is getting extremely close to 0+20−9=2−9.
Find the value of the constant a for which
x→−2limx2+x−2x2+ax+3 exists.
Hint+
The denominator goes to zero; what must the numerator go to?
Answer+
a=27
Full solution+
As x→−2, the denominator goes to 0,
and the numerator goes to −2a+7. For the ratio to have a
limit, the numerator must also converge to 0, so we need a=27.
Then,
Note that f(x)1 is undefined when f(x)=0.
So f(x)1 is undefined at x=−2 and x=2.
We shall look more closely at the behaviour of f(x)1
for x near ±2 shortly.
Plotting the above points, we get the following picture:
Since f(x) is constant when x is between -1 and 0, then also f(x)1 is constant between -1 and 0, so we update our picture:
The big question that remains is the behaviour of f(x)1 when x is near -2 and 2. We can answer this question with limits. As x approaches −2 from the left, f(x) gets closer to zero, and is negative. So f(x)1 will be negative, and will increase in magnitude without bound; that is, x→−2−limf(x)1=−∞. Similarly, as
x approaches −2 from the right, f(x) gets closer to zero, and is positive. So f(x)1 will be positive, and will increase in magnitude without bound; that is, x→−2+limf(x)1=∞. We add this behaviour to our graph:
Now, we consider the behaviour at x=2. Since f(x) gets closer and closer to 0 AND is positive as x approaches 2, we conclude x→2limf(x)1=∞. Adding to our picture:
Now the only remaining blank space is between x=0 and x=1. Since f(x) is a smooth curve that stays away from 0, we can draw some kind of smooth curve here, and call it good enough. (Later on we'll go into more details about drawing graphs. The purpose of this exercise was to utilize what we've learned about limits.)
The graphs of functions f(x) and g(x) are shown in the graphs below. Use these to sketch the graph of g(x)f(x).
Hint+
There is a close relationship between f and g. Fill in the following table:
x
f(x)
g(x)
g(x)f(x)
−3
−2
−1
−0
1
2
3
Answer+
Full solution+
We can start by examining points.
x
f(x)
g(x)
g(x)f(x)
−3
−3
−1.5
2
−2
0
0
UND
−1
3
1.5
2
−0
3
1.5
2
1
1.5
.75
2
2
0
0
UND
3
1
.5
2
We cannot divide by zero, so g(x)f(x) is not defined when x=±2. But for every other value of x that we plotted, f(x) is twice as large as g(x), g(x)f(x)=2. With this in mind, we see that the graph of f(x) is exactly the graph of 2g(x).
This gives us the graph below.
Remark: f(2)=g(2)=0, so g(2)f(2) does not exist, but x→2limg(x)f(x)=2. Although we are trying to “divide by zero" at x=±2, it would be a mistake here to interpret this as a vertical asymptote.
Is it always true that $\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow a} [f(x)+g(x)]=
\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x)+\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow a} g(x)$?
Answer+
(a) DNE , DNE (b) 0 (c) No: it is only true when both x→alimf(x) and x→alimg(x) exist.
Full solution+
(a) Neither limit exists. When x gets close to 0, these limits go to positive infinity from one side, and negative infinity from the other.
(b) $\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} [f(x)+g(x)]=
\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \left[\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{x}\right]=
\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} 0=0$.
(c) No: this is an example of a time when the two individual functions have limits that don't exist, but the limit of their sum does exist.
This “sum rule" is only true when both x→alimf(x) and x→alimg(x) exist.
When you're evaluating x→0−limf(x), you're only considering values of x that are less than 0.
Answer+
(a) x→0−limf(x)=−3
(b) x→0+limf(x)=3
(c) x→0limf(x)= DNE
Full solution+
(a) When we evaluate the limit from the left, we only consider values of x that are less than zero. For these values of x, our function is x2−3. So, x→0−limf(x)=x→0−lim(x2−3)=−3.
(b) When we evaluate the limit from the right, we only consider values of x that are greater than zero. For these values of x, our function is x2+3. So, x→0+limf(x)=x→0+lim(x2+3)=3.
(c) Since the limits from the left and right do not agree, x→0limf(x)= DNE.
To further clarify the situation, the graph of y=f(x) is sketched below:
Note that, because x3+8x2+16x is a polynomial, we can evaluate the limit by directly substituting in x=−4.
(b) When we evaluate x→−4+limf(x), we only consider values of x that are greater than −4. For these values,
f(x)=x2+30x−4x2+8x+16
So,
x→−4+limf(x)=x→−4+limx2+30x−4x2+8x+16
This is a rational function, and x=−4 is in its domain (we aren't doing anything suspect, like dividing by 0), so again we can directly substitute x=−4 to evaluate the limit:
=(−4)2+30(−4)−4(−4)2+8(−4)+16=−1080=0
(c) Since x→−4−limf(x)=x→−4+limf(x)=0, we conclude x→−4limf(x)=0.