Using symmetry, find the centroid of the finite region between the curves and .
Hint
It might help to know that .
Applications of Integration
32 problems · hints, answers and solutions shown beside each one
Do you understand the idea? Usually little or no calculation.
It might help to know that .
Using symmetry, find the centroid of the region inside the unit circle, centred on the origin, and outside a rectangle, also centred on the origin, with width 1 and height 0.5.
The centroid of a region doesn't have to be a point in the region.
A long, straight, thin rod has a number of weights attached along it. True or false: if it balances at position , then the mass to the right of is the same as the mass to the left of .
Read over the very beginning of Section 2.3 in the CLP-2 text, specifically Equation 2.3.1.
In general, false.
A straight rod with negligible mass has the following weights attached to it:
A weight of mass 1 kg, 1m from the left end,
a weight of mass 2 kg, 3m from the left end,
a weight of mass 2 kg, 4m from the left end, and
a weight of mass 1 kg, 6m from the left end.
Where is the centre of mass of the weighted rod?
Use Equation 2.3.1 in the CLP-2 text.
metres from the left end
For each picture below, determine whether the centre of mass is to the left of, to the right of, or along the line , or whether there is not enough information to tell. The shading of a region indicates density: darker shading corresponds to a denser area. In part (d), the right hand side of the right hand rectangle has .
Imagine cutting out the shape and setting it on top of a pencil, so that the pencil lines up with the vertical line . Will the figure balance, or fall to one side? Which side?
(a) to the left (b) to the left (c) not enough information
(d) along the line (e) to the right
Tank is spherical, of radius 1 metre, and filled completely with water. The bottom of tank is three metres above the ground, where Tank sits. Tank is tall and rectangular, with base dimensions 2 metres by 1 metre, and empty. Calculate the work done by gravity to drain all the water from Tank to Tank by modelling the situation as a point mass, of the same mass as the water, being moved from the height of the centre of mass of to the height of the centre of mass of the water after it has been moved to .
You may use kg/m for the density of water, and m/sec for the acceleration due to gravity.
You can find the heights of the centres of mass using symmetry.
Let be the region bounded above by and and below by the -axis, . Let be a rod with density at position , .
What is the area of a thin slice of at position with width ?
What is the mass of a small piece of at position with length ?
What is the total area of ?
What is the total mass of ?
What is the -coordinate of the centroid of ?
What is the centre of mass of ?
Think about whether your answers should have repetition.
(a), (b) (c), (d) (e), (f)
In Questions 8 through 10, you will derive the formulas for the centre of mass of a rod of variable density, and the centroid of a two-dimensional region using vertical slices (Equations 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 in the CLP-2 text). Knowing the equations by heart will allow you to answer many questions in this section; understanding where they came from will you allow to generalize their ideas to answer even more questions.
Suppose is a straight, thin rod with density at a position . Let the left endpoint of lie at , and the right endpoint lie at .
To approximate the centre of mass of , imagine chopping it into pieces of equal length, and approximating the mass of each piece using the density at its midpoint. Give your approximation for the centre of mass in sigma notation.
Take the limit as goes to infinity of your approximation in part (a), and express the result using a definite integral.
The definition of a definite integral (Definition 1.1.9 in the CLP-2 text) will tell you how to convert your limits of sums into integrals.
(a) (b)
Suppose is a two-dimensional object and at (horizontal) position its height is . Its leftmost point is at position , and its rightmost point is at position .
To approximate the -coordinate of the centroid of , we imagine it as a straight, thin rod , where the mass of from is equal to the area of from .
If is the sheet shown below, sketch as a rod with the same horizontal length, shaded darker when is denser, and lighter when is less dense.
If we cut into strips of very small width , what is the area of the strip at position ?
Using your answer from (b), what is the density of at position ?
Using your result from Question 8(b), give the -coordinate of the centroid of . Your answer will be in terms of , , , and .
In (a), the slices all have the same width, so the area of the slices is larger (and hence the density of is higher) where is larger.
(a)
(b) (c) (d)
Suppose is flat sheet with uniform density, and at (horizontal) position its height is . Its leftmost point is at position , and its rightmost point is at position .
To approximate the -coordinate of the centroid of , we imagine it as a straight, thin, vertical rod . We slice into thin, vertical strips, and model these as weights on with:
position on , where is the centre of mass of the strip, and
mass in equal to the area of the strip in .
If is the sheet shown below, slice it into a number of vertical pieces of equal length, approximated by rectangles. For each rectangle, mark its centre of mass. Sketch as a rod with the same vertical height, with weights corresponding to the slices you made of .
Imagine a thin strip of at position , with thickness . What is the area of the strip? What is the -value of its centre of mass?
Recall the centre of mass of a rod with weights of mass at position is given by
Considering the limit of this formula as goes to infinity, give the -coordinate of the centre of mass of .
Part (a) is a significantly different model from the last question.
(a) The strips between and at the left end of the figure all have the same centre of mass, which is the -value where , . So, there should be multiple weights of different mass piled up at that -value.
Similarly, the strips between and at the right end of the figure all have the same centre of mass, which is the -value where , . So, there should be a second pile of weights of different mass, at that (higher) -value.
Between these two piles, there are a collection of weights with identical mass distributed fairly evenly. The top and bottom ends of (above the uppermost pile, and below the lowermost pile) have no weights.
One possible answer (using twelve slices):
(b) The area of the strip is , and its centre of mass is at height .
(c)
Express the –coordinate of the centroid of the triangle with vertices , , and in terms of a definite integral. Do not evaluate the integral.
Which method involves more work: horizontal strips or vertical strips?
Practising the skill itself, until applying it is automatic.
A long, thin rod extends from to metres, and its density at position is given by kg/m. Where is the centre of mass of the rod?
This is a straightforward application of Equation 2.3.2 in the CLP-2 text.
A long, thin rod extends from to metres, and its density at position is given by kg/m. Where is the centre of mass of the rod?
Remember the derivative of arctangent is
Find the -coordinate of the centroid of the region bounded by the curves , , and . You may use the fact that the area of this region equals .
This is a straightforward application of Equations 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 in the
CLP-2 text. Note that you're only asked for the -coordinate of the centroid.
Consider the region bounded by , , and .
Sketch this region.
Find the –coordinate of the centroid of this region.
You can use a trigonometric substitution to find the area, then a partial fraction decomposition to find the -coordinate of the centroid. Remember .
(a)
(b)
Vertical slices will be easier than horizontal. An integration by parts might be helpful to find , while trigonometric identities are important to finding .
and
Let denote the area of the plane region bounded by , , and , where is a positive constant.
Find the coordinates of the centroid of this region in terms of and .
For what value of is the centroid on the line ?
No trigonometric substitution is necessary if you're clever with your -substitutions, and remember the derivative of arctangent.
(a) , (b)
The region is the portion of the plane which is above the curve and below the curve .
Sketch the region
Find the area of .
Find the coordinate of the centroid of .
In , the top function is , and the bottom function is .
(a)
(b) (c)
Remember .
Find the centroid of the region below, which consists of a semicircle of radius on top of a rectangle of width and height .
You can save quite a bit of work by, firstly, exploiting symmetry and, secondly, thinking about whether it is more efficient to use vertical strips or horizontal strips.
and
Let be the region below the graph of the curve and above the -axis.
Using an appropriate integral, find the area of the region ; simplify your answer completely.
Find the centre of mass of the region ; simplify your answer completely. (Assume it has constant density .)
Sketch the region, being careful the domain of . You can save quite a bit of work by exploiting symmetry.
(a) (b) and
Horizontal slices will be easier than vertical.
Start with a picture: whether you use vertical slices or horizontal, you'll need to break your integral into multiple pieces.
Further than practice: several ideas at once, or an unfamiliar situation.
Find the -coordinate of the centre of mass of the (infinite) region lying to the right of the line , above the –axis, and below the graph of .
For practice, do the computation twice — once with horizontal strips and once with vertical strips. Watch for improper integrals.
Let be the region to the right of the -axis that is bounded by the graphs of and .
Find the centroid of , assuming it has constant density . The area of is (you don't have to show this).
Write down an expression, using horizontal slices (disks), for the volume obtained when the region is rotated around the -axis. Do not evaluate any integrals; simply write down an expression for the volume.
Draw a sketch. In part (b) be careful about the equation of the right hand boundary of .
(a) , (b)
(a) Find the –coordinate of the centroid of the region bounded by , , , and .
(b) Calculate the volume of the solid generated by rotating the region from part (a) about the line .
Draw a sketch. Rotating about a horizontal line is similar to rotating about the -axis, but for the radius of a slice, you'll need to know : the distance from the outer edge of the region (the boundary function's -value) to .
(a) (b)
Suppose a rectangle has width 4 m, height 3 m, and its density metres from its left edge is kg/m. Find the centre of mass of the rectangle.
Go back to the derivation of Equation 2.3.3 in the CLP-2 text (centroid for a region) to figure out what to do when your surface does not have uniform density. We will consider a rod that reaches from to , and the mass of the section of the rod along is equal to the mass of the strip of our rectangle along .
Suppose a circle of radius 3 m has density kg/m at any point metres above its bottom. Find the centre of mass of the circle.
Horizontal slices will help you, where symmetry doesn't, to set up a rod whose centre of mass is the same as one coordinate of the centre of mass of the circle. When you're integrating, trigonometric substitutions are sometimes the easiest way, and sometimes not.
The equation of a circle of radius 3, centred at , is .
A right circular cone of uniform density has base radius m and height m. We want to find its centre of mass. By symmetry, we know that the centre of mass will occur somewhere along the straight vertical line through the tip of the cone and the centre of its base. The only question is the height of the centre of mass.
We will model the cone as a rod with height , such that the mass of the section of the rod from position to position is the same as the volume of the cone from height to height . (You can imagine that the cone is an umbrella, and we've closed it up to look like a cane. (This analogy isn't exact: if the cone were an umbrella, closing it would move the outside fabric vertically. A more accurate, but less familiar, image might be vacuum-wrapping an umbrella, watching it shrivel towards the middle but not move vertically.))
Using this model, calculate how high above the base of the cone its centre of mass is.
If we cut off the top metres of the cone (leaving an object of height ), how high above the base is the new centre of mass?
The model in the question gives you the setup to solve this problem. You know how to find the centre of mass of a rod–that's Equation 2.3.2 in the CLP-2 text — so all you need to find is , the density of the rod at position . To find this, consider a thin slice of the cone at position with thickness . Its volume is the same as the mass of the small section of the rod at position with thickness . So, the density of the rod at position is .
(a) (b)
An hourglass is shaped like two identical truncated cones attached together. Their base radius is 5 cm, the height of the entire hourglass is 18 cm, and the radius at the thinnest point is cm. The hourglass contains sand that fills up the bottom 6 cm when it's settled, with mass grams and uniform density. We want to know the work done flipping the hourglass smoothly, so the sand settles into a truncated, inverted-cone shape before it starts to fall down.
Using the methods of Section 2.1 to calculate the work done would be quite tedious. Instead, we will model the sand as a point of mass kg, being lifted from the centre of mass of its original position to the centre of mass of its upturned position. Using the results of Question 29, how much work was done on the sand?
To simplify your calculation, you may assume that the height of the upturned sand (that is, the distance from the skinniest part of the hourglass to the top of the sand) is 8.8 cm. (Actually, it's cm.) So, the top 0.2 cm of the hourglass is empty.
Use similar triangles to show that the shape of the lower (also upper) half of the hourglass is a truncated cone, where the untruncated cone would have had a height 10 cm.
To calculate the centre of mass of the upturned sand using the result of Question 29, you should find (not –think carefully about our model from Question 29) and . For the centre of mass of the sand before turning, and .
about 0.833 N
Tank is in the shape of half a sphere of radius 1 metre, with its flat face resting on the ground, and is completely filled with water. Tank is empty and rectangular, with a square base of side length 1 m and a height of 3 m.
To pump the water from Tank to Tank , we need to pump all the water from Tank to a height of 3 m. How much work is done to pump all the water from Tank to a height of 3 m? You may model the water as a point mass, originally situated at the centre of mass of the full Tank .
Suppose we could move the water from Tank directly to its final position in Tank without going over the top of Tank . (For example, maybe tank is elastic, and Tank is just Tank after being smooshed into a different form.) How much work is done pumping the water? (That is, how much work is done moving a point mass from the centre of mass of Tank to the centre of mass of Tank ?)
What percentage of work from part (a) was “wasted" by pumping the water over the top of Tank , instead of moving it directly to its final position?
You may assume that the only work done is against the acceleration due to gravity, m/sec, and that the density of water is 1000 kg/m.
Remark: the answer from (b) is what you might think of as the net work involved in pumping the water from Tank to Tank . When work gets “wasted," the pump does some work pumping water up, then gravity does equal and opposite work bringing the water back down.
The techniques of Section 2.1 get pretty complicated here, so it's easiest to use the techniques we developed in Questions 6, 29, and 30 in this section. That is, (1) find the height of the centre of mass of the water in its starting and ending positions, and then (2) model the work done as the work moving a point mass with the weight of the water from the first centre of mass to the second.
The height change of the centre of mass is all that matters to calculate the work done against gravity, so you only have to worry about the height of the centres of mass.
(a) 17,150 J (b) (c) about 74%
Let be the region bounded above by and below by the -axis, . Give an approximation of the -value of the centroid of with error no more than .
You may assume without proof that over the interval .
The area of is precisely one, so the error in your approximation is the error involved in approximating .
From the UBC Math 101 open textbook project, © Joel Feldman, Andrew Rechnitzer, Elyse Yeager and others. Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; this HTML adaptation is released under the same licence. Full attribution.