Open-Book or Closed-Book Practice Tests: Which Is Better?

Start closed book if your real exam is closed book, then open your materials to check and correct your work. If the real exam is open book, practise that format too. The useful choice is usually not one format forever, but closed first and open second.
A week before finals, you start a mock exam. Your notes and formula sheet are sitting beside you. Keeping them nearby might help you finish. Hiding them might reveal that you remember less than you thought.
You do not have to choose one format for the whole study session. A closed-book attempt can test what you can produce without help. An open-book correction phase can then help you repair what was missing.
Closed-book practice gives you a more honest check
Answering without notes requires retrieval, which means bringing information back from memory. A review of many studies found that practice tests improved later memory more than studying the same material again[1]. Tests requiring students to recall an answer produced greater benefits than tests asking them only to recognize one[1].
Another review covered 122 experiments involving 10,382 learners. It found that practice testing could also help students answer questions in different formats and apply knowledge in new situations[2]. The benefit was weaker for some tasks, including questions based on worked examples[2].
This makes a closed-book attempt useful as a check. If you cannot begin a question without a formula sheet, that difficulty matters. If you know the main idea but forget one detail, that is a different gap. Notes can hide the difference when they are available from the start.
Closed book does not mean refusing all help for the rest of the session. It means delaying help until you have produced the best answer you can.
Open-book correction is part of the practice
Closing your notes creates a useful challenge. It does not guarantee that your answer is correct. That is why the second phase matters.
In two experiments, both open-book and closed-book tests improved later memory when students received feedback. On a later test, neither format had a clear advantage over the other[3]. Open-book testing produced better scores during the first attempt, but that advantage did not remain later[3].
Feedback should do more than display the answer. A review of 40 reports found that feedback could support error correction, especially when learners had to think about and apply it[4]. In a university classroom study, tested material was remembered better than untested material, and feedback helped students correct errors[5].
After your closed-book attempt, open your notes, answer key, or worked feedback. Compare the method, not only the final answer. Find where your reasoning changed direction. Then close the materials and try the missed part again.
Copying a polished solution is not the same as correcting your thinking. Your correction should state what you missed and what you will do differently next time.
Match the real exam before finals
Your final rounds of practice should resemble the exam you will actually take. If the exam is closed book, complete some full sections without notes. If it is open book, practise deciding when a lookup is necessary and where to find information quickly.
One field experiment compared open-book and closed-book questions across seven lessons in university courses. The closed-book group did better on a surprise test and again on the later course exam[6].
Expectations can also change preparation. In the second of two experiments using reading materials, students expecting an open-book test spent less time studying[7]. They later performed worse on closed-book questions testing understanding and application[7].
However, closed book is not always the overall winner. A review covering 3,499 learners found that open-book and closed-book exams were comparably effective overall[8]. That result supports matching practice to the demands ahead rather than treating one format as universally superior.
Use a closed-then-open routine
A workable practice session has distinct phases:
- Set the exam rules. Decide whether you are copying the real exam conditions or diagnosing gaps. Put away anything the real exam will not allow.
- Attempt the questions from memory. Practice recall supports later memory[1]. It can also help when later questions require application or a different format[2].
- Mark uncertainty without looking immediately. Finish as much reasoning as you can. A small mark beside the question is enough.
- Open your materials and correct carefully. Feedback can help correct mistaken answers[4][5].
- Close everything and retry. Reproduce the missing idea or step without copying. This turns the correction into another retrieval attempt.
For a mathematics practice exam, begin without notes or a formula sheet. Separate questions you could solve from those where you forgot a method, condition, or formula. Then use your notes and worked feedback to correct those gaps. Close the materials before attempting the troublesome questions again.
Do not let the first closed-book score become a verdict on your ability. Its purpose is to locate work that still needs attention. A low practice score can be useful if it arrives early enough to guide the next session.
Open book can come first when the material is still new
Closed-book work can become unproductive when you have not yet understood the basic material.
If you are still learning a topic, begin with the explanation available. Work through the reasoning and identify the main steps. Then hide the material and explain or apply the idea from memory.
A study of tasks that asked learners to build connections between ideas compared open, closed, and switchable formats. Allowing learners to move between closed-book retrieval and open-book support produced better learning than using either format alone[9]. This supports a flexible sequence when the task requires both memory and careful construction.
What these studies do not settle
Only two experiments here directly compared open-book and closed-book practice tests with feedback, and they used prose passages rather than mathematics exams[3]. The broad review examined exam formats, not one fixed practice routine[8].
One university field experiment favored closed-book testing[6]. The direct practice-test experiments found equal delayed memory when both formats included feedback[3]. A closed-then-open drawing experiment with 308 students also found no later learning advantage over staying open book[10].
These results do not establish one perfect sequence for every course. Treat closed first and open second as a useful default. Change it when the real exam rules or your current understanding call for something else.
Make your next mock exam a two-pass test
Before your next mock, place your notes out of reach. Complete the questions you can and mark the points where memory fails. Do not interrupt every difficult question with a lookup.
After the attempt, bring back your notes and worked feedback. Correct each gap in writing. Then close everything and retry the missed questions from a blank page.
Before finals, complete another practice section under the exact rules of the real exam. That last step tells you whether the correction now survives without immediate support.
Summary
- Start closed book. Attempt the mock exam before opening notes or a formula sheet.
- Correct with materials. Compare your method with notes, answers, and worked feedback.
- Retry from memory. Close everything and redo each missed question.
- Match the final format. Practise one section under the real exam rules.
References
- Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
- Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000151
- Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1391
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170535
- Vojdanoska, M., Cranney, J., & Newell, B. R. (2009). The testing effect: The role of feedback and collaboration in a tertiary classroom setting. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1183–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1630
- Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., & Schwede, A. (2019). Open-Book Versus Closed-Book Tests in University Classes: A Field Experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00463 Free full text
- Agarwal, P. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2011). Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test. Memory, 19(8), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.613840
- Permzadian, V., & Cho, K. W. (2025). Does test format affect learning? A meta-analysis comparing the effect of closed-book and open-book examinations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1098–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2502590
- Waldeyer, J., Heitmann, S., Moning, J., & Roelle, J. (2020). Can generative learning tasks be optimized by incorporation of retrieval practice?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.05.001
- Kim, S., Abel, R., Leutner, D., Schmiemann, P., & Roelle, J. (2025). Can the effects of generative drawing on lasting learning be optimized through integration of retrieval practice?. Learning and Instruction, 98, 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102143
