Differential Calculus
Curve Sketching
Curve sketching is the synthesis topic of differential calculus: from a formula alone you recover domain, symmetry, end behaviour, asymptotes, and the shape information carried by and , then draw a graph that is correct in every qualitative feature. No new theory appears here — it is limits, l'Hopital's Rule, the monotonicity test (a corollary of the Mean Value Theorem) and the concavity test used together. Work the checklist in order: each step rules out a class of drawing errors, and plotting random points is never a substitute.
The checklist
- Domain. 2. Intercepts. 3. Symmetry / periodicity. 4. Asymptotes (vertical, horizontal, slant). 5. : sign chart, monotonicity, critical points, local extrema. 6. : sign chart, concavity, inflection points. 7. Assemble the sketch.
1. Domain
Exclude zeros of denominators, negative arguments of even roots, and non-positive arguments of . Write the domain as a union of intervals; the graph can only break at excluded points. Cube roots are fine for negative inputs: and have domain .
2. Intercepts
The -intercept is ; it exists only when belongs to the domain (for instance has none), and there is at most one, because a function assigns one output to each input. The -intercepts solve ; for a quotient this means numerator zero and denominator nonzero. If the zeros are not findable exactly, locate them approximately with the Intermediate Value Theorem — a sign change of a continuous on guarantees a root inside.
3. Symmetry
- is even if for every in the domain (which must itself be symmetric about ): graph symmetric in the -axis.
- is odd if : graph symmetric about the origin.
- is periodic with period if : sketch one period and repeat.
- More generally the graph is symmetric about the point exactly when for all admissible . Every cubic has this symmetry about its inflection point.
Symmetry halves the work: analyse and reflect.
4. Asymptotes
Vertical. The line is a vertical asymptote if at least one of , equals or . Always compute both one-sided limits with their signs — that is what tells you which way each branch runs. For a rational function written in lowest terms the vertical asymptotes are exactly the zeros of the denominator; a factor that cancels completely gives a hole (removable discontinuity), not an asymptote.
Horizontal. The line is a horizontal asymptote if or . The two ends may give different values, so a function has at most two horizontal asymptotes. A graph is allowed to cross a horizontal asymptote: the statement is only about the tails.
Slant (oblique). The line with is a slant asymptote if (or the same at ). In general and ; for a rational function just do polynomial long division. The sign of the remainder tells you whether the graph sits above or below the line on each branch.
| Rational in lowest terms | End behaviour as | Linear asymptote |
|---|---|---|
| ratio of leading coefficients | ||
| , | slant | |
| none (quotient is a curvilinear asymptote) |
With square roots, remember , so for you must factor out , not .
l'Hopital's Rule (the tool for indeterminate tails). Suppose and are differentiable on an open interval containing , except possibly at itself, with there, and suppose has the indeterminate form or . If exists as a finite number or as , then The same statement holds for one-sided limits and for . All three hypotheses matter: verify the indeterminate form first, because on a quotient that is not indeterminate the rule usually returns a wrong value — , while differentiating top and bottom gives . And if the limit of the ratio of derivatives fails to exist (and is not ) the rule yields no conclusion — return to the original expression; even though does not exist. Never differentiate the quotient with the quotient rule; differentiate top and bottom separately.
5. First derivative: monotonicity and extrema
Critical number: a number in the domain of with or undefined. Points outside the domain are never critical numbers.
Increasing/Decreasing Test. If is continuous on and differentiable on with throughout , then is increasing on ; if throughout, is decreasing. Continuity on the whole interval is essential — monotonicity conclusions can never be carried across a vertical asymptote or a gap.
First Derivative Test. Let be a critical number of , let be continuous at , and let be differentiable on an open interval containing except possibly at itself (this is what makes "the sign of on each side" meaningful). If changes from to at , then is a local maximum; from to , a local minimum; if keeps the same sign on both sides, gives neither.
Second Derivative Test. If is continuous on an open interval containing and , then local minimum, local maximum, and no conclusion (fall back on the First Derivative Test).
Building the sign chart: mark on a number line every critical number and every point missing from the domain (asymptotes, holes, endpoints). Test one point in each resulting open interval using the factored form of , tracking only the sign of each factor.
6. Second derivative: concavity and inflection
Let be differentiable on an interval . Then is concave up on if is increasing on (equivalently, the graph lies above each of its tangent lines on ), and concave down on if is decreasing on .
Concavity Test. Suppose exists on the interval . If for all then is concave up on ; if for all then is concave down on . (The converse is only one-way: is concave up on yet .)
Inflection point: a point on the graph where is continuous at and the concavity changes at . If exists then is necessary, but it is not sufficient: has and no inflection. Concavity can also change where fails to exist ( at ). A sign change of across a vertical asymptote is not an inflection point, because is not in the domain.
Vertical tangents and cusps. Suppose is continuous at , differentiable on both sides of near , and as . If has the same sign on both sides there is a vertical tangent at ; if the signs are opposite there is a cusp.
| Shape of the arc | ||
|---|---|---|
| increasing, concave up (rise steepens) | ||
| increasing, concave down (rise flattens) | ||
| decreasing, concave up (fall flattens) | ||
| decreasing, concave down (fall steepens) |
7. Assembling the sketch
Draw the asymptotes as dashed lines, plot the intercepts and every critical and inflection point with coordinates, mark the direction of each tail, then join with arcs whose slope sign and concavity match the two charts. Sanity check: between consecutive critical numbers the curve cannot turn around.
Worked example 1: a rational function with a slant asymptote
Domain: , i.e. .
Intercepts: ; . Only .
Symmetry: , which is neither nor . None.
Asymptotes: the numerator at is , so nothing cancels and is a vertical asymptote: (numerator , denominator then ). Long division: , so Since as , the slant asymptote is ; the degrees are and , so there is no horizontal asymptote. Because , the graph lies above for and below it for .
First derivative:
| Interval | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| increasing | |||||
| decreasing | |||||
| decreasing | |||||
| increasing |
Critical numbers and ( is not one: it is not in the domain). Local maximum , local minimum .
Second derivative: , never zero. It is negative for (concave down) and positive for (concave up); since is not in the domain, there is no inflection point. Cross-check: confirms the maximum, confirms the minimum.
Sketch: the left branch rises along from below, peaks at , then plunges to at , concave down throughout. The right branch drops from at to the minimum and then rises, staying above and concave up throughout.
Worked example 2: an exponential
Domain: . Intercepts: only . Symmetry: none.
End behaviour: as write , an indeterminate form with both functions differentiable and ; by l'Hopital's Rule , and since this limit exists the application is legitimate. So is a horizontal asymptote as , approached from above because for . As , and , so : no asymptote there (and no indeterminate form, so l'Hopital would be illegal). No vertical asymptotes.
First derivative: . Since always, for and for : increasing on , decreasing on . Local (indeed absolute) maximum at .
Second derivative: . So on and on : concave down then up, with inflection point . Check: , consistent with a maximum at .
Sketch: rising steeply out of on the left, crossing the origin, peaking at , bending at and then decaying to the axis from above.
Common mistakes
| Wrong | Right |
|---|---|
| "The denominator vanishes at , so is a vertical asymptote." | Cancel first: for has a hole at , not an asymptote. |
| "A curve never crosses its asymptote." | Only vertical asymptotes are never crossed. crosses at the origin; crosses its slant asymptote at the origin. |
| ", so is an inflection point." | has but on both sides: no concavity change, no inflection. |
| ", so there is a local extremum at ." | at : does not change sign. Apply the First Derivative Test. |
| " does not exist, so there is no extremum at ." | has undefined and an absolute minimum at the cusp . Critical numbers include such points, provided is in the domain. |
| " is decreasing on " for . | Report and separately: is undefined at and jumps from to there. |
| Doing long division for a slant asymptote whenever the top degree is larger. | Only gives a line. has the parabolic asymptote . |
| Reading the sign of by plugging test points into . | Substitute test points into the factored , and track factor signs only. |
| Assuming both tails share one horizontal asymptote. | as but as , because when . |
Key terms
- domain
- x-intercept
- y-intercept
- even function
- odd function
- point symmetry
- vertical asymptote
- horizontal asymptote
- slant (oblique) asymptote
- curvilinear asymptote
- removable discontinuity (hole)
- polynomial long division
- end behaviour
- l'Hopital's Rule
- critical number
- sign chart
- Increasing/Decreasing Test
- First Derivative Test
- Second Derivative Test
- local maximum
- local minimum
- concave up
- concave down
- Concavity Test
- inflection point
- cusp
- vertical tangent
Practice Problems
For , find the domain, all intercepts, any symmetry, and every vertical and horizontal asymptote (with the appropriate one-sided limits). Does the graph ever cross its horizontal asymptote?
Show hint
Factor the top and the bottom first and check whether anything cancels; only then look for asymptotes.
Show answer
Factor: . No common factors, so the quotient is already in lowest terms (no holes).
Domain: at , so the domain is .
Intercepts: , giving . Setting the numerator to zero, , and the denominator is nonzero there, so the -intercepts are and .
Symmetry: the domain is symmetric about and so is even: the graph is symmetric in the -axis.
Vertical asymptotes: at the numerator equals , so is a vertical asymptote. For slightly less than , ; for slightly more, : By evenness the same happens mirrored at :
Horizontal asymptote: divide numerator and denominator by : so is a horizontal asymptote at both ends (equal degrees, ratio of leading coefficients ).
Crossing? would need , i.e. , which is impossible: the graph never crosses . Position: , which is positive when and negative when . So both outer branches approach from above, while the middle arch lies entirely below (its highest point is the -intercept ).
Analyse : give the domain, the coordinates of any hole, every asymptote (with one-sided limits at any vertical asymptote), the intercepts, and state on which side of the horizontal asymptote each branch lies.
Show hint
Factor both quadratics. A factor that cancels does not create an asymptote.
Show answer
Factor: and , so
Domain: and : .
Hole: the factor cancels, so is a removable discontinuity: There is an open circle (hole) at — not a vertical asymptote.
Vertical asymptote: (it does not cancel; the reduced numerator there is ). Since :
Horizontal asymptote: equal degrees, leading coefficients and , so . Equivalently
Intercepts: , so ; when , so .
Position relative to : , which is negative for and positive for . The right branch lies below and rises toward it; the left branch lies above and falls toward it. (Consistently, , so is increasing on each branch, and the graph never crosses .)
Find every asymptote of , including the slant asymptote, and determine on which side of the slant asymptote the graph lies on each branch.
Show hint
Degree of the top is exactly one more than the degree of the bottom — so divide.
Show answer
Vertical asymptote: the denominator vanishes at , and the numerator there is , so nothing cancels and is a vertical asymptote.
Long division: divide by .
2x^{2}\div x&=2x, & 2x(x+2)&=2x^{2}+4x, & (2x^{2}+3x-1)-(2x^{2}+4x)&=-x-1\\ -x\div x&=-1, & -1(x+2)&=-x-2, & (-x-1)-(-x-2)&=1 \end{aligned}$$ So $2x^{2}+3x-1=(x+2)(2x-1)+1$ and $$f(x)=2x-1+\frac{1}{x+2}$$ (Check: $(x+2)(2x-1)+1=2x^{2}-x+4x-2+1=2x^{2}+3x-1$.) **One-sided limits at $x=-2$:** the term $2x-1\to-5$ is bounded, while $\dfrac{1}{x+2}\to\pm\infty$: $$\lim_{x\to-2^+}f(x)=+\infty \qquad \lim_{x\to-2^-}f(x)=-\infty$$ **Horizontal asymptote:** none. The numerator has degree $2$, the denominator degree $1$, so $|f(x)|\to\infty$ as $x\to\pm\infty$. **Slant asymptote:** $\dfrac{1}{x+2}\to0$ as $x\to\pm\infty$, hence $$\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\left[f(x)-(2x-1)\right]=\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\frac{1}{x+2}=0$$ so $y=2x-1$ is a slant asymptote at both ends. **Which side:** $f(x)-(2x-1)=\dfrac{1}{x+2}$, so - for $x>-2$ the difference is positive: the right branch lies **above** the line $y=2x-1$; - for $x<-2$ it is negative: the left branch lies **below** the line. The graph never meets the line (the difference is never $0$). **Remark (turning points).** $f'(x)=2-\dfrac{1}{(x+2)^{2}}=0$ gives $(x+2)^{2}=\dfrac12$, i.e. $x=-2\pm\dfrac{1}{\sqrt2}$, with a local maximum $f\left(-2-\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}\right)=-5-2\sqrt2\approx-7.83$ and a local minimum $f\left(-2+\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}\right)=-5+2\sqrt2\approx-2.17$.For the polynomial , find the intervals of increase and decrease, all local extrema (with coordinates), the intervals of concavity, the inflection point, and describe the resulting sketch.
Show hint
Differentiate and factor completely; a polynomial has no asymptotes, so the sign charts do all the work.
Show answer
Domain and end behaviour: all of ; no asymptotes. Since the leading term is , as and as . -intercept .
First derivative: Critical numbers: and .
| Interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| increasing | ||||
| decreasing | ||||
| increasing |
changes at : local maximum changes at : local minimum
Second derivative: , so on (concave down) and on (concave up). The concavity changes at , and so the inflection point is .
Cross-check with the Second Derivative Test: (local max) and (local min) — consistent.
Sketch: the curve rises out of , concave down, to the local maximum ; it falls, still concave down, through the inflection point , where it becomes concave up, continuing down to the local minimum , then rises to concave up. The three -intercepts (roots of ) are not rational; by the Intermediate Value Theorem they lie in , and , approximately . The graph is symmetric about the inflection point , as every cubic is.
Find all horizontal asymptotes of , justifying the limit at each end separately. Are there any vertical asymptotes?
Show hint
Divide top and bottom by — but pulling inside a square root requires , and when .
Show answer
Domain: for every real , so the domain is and the denominator never vanishes. Hence there are no vertical asymptotes.
Limit as . For we have , so Dividing numerator and denominator by :
Limit as . Now , so and Therefore
Conclusion: two horizontal asymptotes,
Numerical check: at , ; at , . Both are closing in on .
The common error is to write at both ends, which would wrongly give at as well.
Carry out the full curve-sketching checklist for : domain, intercepts, symmetry, asymptotes, monotonicity and extrema, concavity and inflection points, then describe the graph.
Show hint
The denominator is never zero, so all the interest is in the two sign charts; use the quotient rule and factor the results.
Show answer
1. Domain: , so the domain is ; is continuous everywhere.
2. Intercepts: , and . The only intercept is the origin.
3. Symmetry: , so is odd: symmetric about the origin.
4. Asymptotes: no vertical asymptotes (denominator never zero). Degree over degree , so is a horizontal asymptote at both ends. The graph crosses it at the origin ( for , for ).
5. First derivative (quotient rule): The denominator is always positive, so has the sign of : critical numbers .
| Interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| decreasing | |||
| increasing | |||
| decreasing |
Local minimum and local maximum ; since at both ends, these are the absolute extrema.
6. Second derivative. Differentiate :
f''(x)&=(-2x)(x^{2}+1)^{-2}+(1-x^{2})(-2)(x^{2}+1)^{-3}(2x)\\ &=-2x(x^{2}+1)^{-3}\left[(x^{2}+1)+2(1-x^{2})\right]\\ &=-2x(x^{2}+1)^{-3}\left(3-x^{2}\right)=\frac{2x\left(x^{2}-3\right)}{(x^{2}+1)^{3}} \end{aligned}$$ The denominator is positive, so $f''$ has the sign of $2x(x^{2}-3)$, with zeros $x=-\sqrt3,\,0,\,\sqrt3$. | Interval | $2x$ | $x^{2}-3$ | $f''$ | Concavity | |---|---|---|---|---| | $(-\infty,-\sqrt3)$ | $-$ | $+$ | $-$ | down | | $(-\sqrt3,0)$ | $-$ | $-$ | $+$ | up | | $(0,\sqrt3)$ | $+$ | $-$ | $-$ | down | | $(\sqrt3,\infty)$ | $+$ | $+$ | $+$ | up | All three are genuine sign changes, so there are three inflection points: $$\left(-\sqrt3,-\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\right),\quad (0,0),\quad \left(\sqrt3,\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\right)$$ using $f(\sqrt3)=\dfrac{\sqrt3}{3+1}=\dfrac{\sqrt3}{4}\approx0.433$. **7. Sketch:** read the two charts together. On $(-\infty,-\sqrt3)$ it is decreasing and concave down (falling away from the asymptote $y=0$), on $\left(-\sqrt3,-1\right)$ decreasing and concave up through the inflection point $\left(-\sqrt3,-\frac{\sqrt3}{4}\right)\approx(-1.73,-0.43)$, reaching the absolute minimum $\left(-1,-\frac12\right)$; it then increases through the origin (steepest point, slope $f'(0)=1$, and an inflection), rises to the maximum $\left(1,\frac12\right)$, and finally decreases to $0^+$, concave down until $x=\sqrt3$ and concave up after it. The whole picture is symmetric about the origin.Sketch completely: domain, intercepts, behaviour as (justify the limit at ), monotonicity, local extrema, concavity and inflection points.
Show hint
For the tail at rewrite the function as a quotient and check that l'Hopital's hypotheses hold before using it; for the derivatives, factor out .
Show answer
Domain: . Intercepts: and (since always), so the only intercept is . Also everywhere. Symmetry: none.
End behaviour. As write . This is of the form , numerator and denominator are differentiable and , so l'Hopital's Rule applies: (the second use is again , and the final limit exists, which validates both steps). So is a horizontal asymptote as , approached from above since .
As : and , so . This is not an indeterminate form, so l'Hopital must not be used here. There is no asymptote on the left and no vertical asymptote anywhere.
First derivative (product rule): Since , the sign of is the sign of ; critical numbers and .
| Interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decreasing | ||||
| increasing | ||||
| decreasing |
Local minimum at — in fact the absolute minimum, since . Local maximum at which is the absolute maximum on but not on (the left tail is unbounded).
Second derivative: Set : , i.e. and . The parabola opens upward, so
| Interval | Concavity | |
|---|---|---|
| up | ||
| down | ||
| up |
Both are sign changes, so there are two inflection points. Their heights, using :
Consistency check: confirms the local minimum at , and confirms the local maximum at .
Sketch: falling steeply from on the left while concave up, flattening into the minimum at the origin, rising (concave up until , then concave down) to the hump at , then decaying, concave down until and concave up thereafter, hugging the positive -axis from above.
Determine the constants and so that the curve has an inflection point at and a critical point at . Then classify all critical points, give the coordinates of the inflection point, and describe the graph.
Show hint
Translate each condition into an equation in and using and , and remember to verify at the end that the inflection candidate really is one.
Show answer
Set up.
Condition 1 (inflection at ): an inflection point requires (here exists everywhere, so this is necessary):
Condition 2 (critical point at ): :
So , and
Verify the inflection point is genuine: changes from negative to positive at , so the concavity really does change there. Concave down on , concave up on . Height:
All critical points: gives and .
- , and is continuous, so by the Second Derivative Test gives a local maximum: , point .
- , so gives a local minimum: , point .
(First Derivative Test agrees: on , on , on .)
Description of the graph: increasing and concave down up to the local maximum ; decreasing and concave down to the inflection point ; decreasing and concave up to the local minimum ; then increasing and concave up to . As , . The -intercept is , which is also the local maximum, and the curve is symmetric about its inflection point (i.e. for all ).
Sketch completely. In particular identify all critical numbers (including any where fails to exist), classify the behaviour at (vertical tangent or cusp?), and find the inflection point.
Show hint
Expand into a sum of powers of before differentiating, then factor out the most negative power of in each derivative.
Show answer
Rewrite: .
Domain: all of (cube roots accept negative inputs). Intercepts: when or , so and . Symmetry: none. Asymptotes: none; as , , and as , while , so .
First derivative:
Critical numbers: at ; does not exist at , and is in the domain, so is also a critical number.
| Interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| increasing | ||||
| decreasing | ||||
| increasing |
By the First Derivative Test: local maximum at () and local minimum at
Behaviour at : is continuous at and The tangent slopes blow up with opposite signs, so the graph has a cusp at the origin (a sharp upward spike), not a vertical tangent.
Second derivative: For , , so has the sign of :
| Interval | Concavity | |
|---|---|---|
| down | ||
| up | ||
| up |
The concavity changes only at , where , so the single inflection point is . At the second derivative is undefined but the concavity is up on both sides, so the origin is not an inflection point.
Sketch: rising from on the far left, concave down until , then concave up as it climbs to the cusp peak at the origin; from the cusp it drops (concave up) to the minimum , then rises through the -intercept and on to , concave up the whole way.
Produce a complete analysis and sketch of : domain, symmetry, intercepts, all asymptotes (with one-sided limits and slant asymptote), monotonicity and extrema, concavity and inflection points. Explain why the local maximum value is smaller than the local minimum value.
Show hint
Divide first: writing makes both the slant asymptote and the derivatives much easier.
Show answer
Domain: at , so . The factorisation shows nothing cancels.
Symmetry: : odd, symmetric about the origin.
Intercepts: , so only the origin .
Vertical asymptotes at and . Near the numerator and changes sign: Near the numerator , while for and for :
Slant asymptote: , so and as , giving the slant asymptote (no horizontal asymptote, since the degrees differ by exactly ). Position: is positive on and (graph above the line) and negative on and (below). The graph crosses its slant asymptote at the origin.
First derivative: differentiating , The denominator is positive and , so has the sign of (and ). Critical numbers: .
| Interval | sign of | |
|---|---|---|
| increasing | ||
| decreasing | ||
| decreasing | ||
| decreasing | ||
| decreasing | ||
| increasing |
Local maximum at : . Local minimum at : . At , but on both sides, so the origin is not an extremum — just a horizontal tangent on a decreasing arc.
Why max min: the two extrema live on different branches, separated by the vertical asymptotes; "local" compares only with nearby points, and no continuous path inside the domain joins to .
Second derivative: differentiate :
\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(x^{2}+1\right)\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{-2}\right]&=2x\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{-2}-4x\left(x^{2}+1\right)\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{-3}\\ &=2x\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{-3}\left[\left(x^{2}-1\right)-2\left(x^{2}+1\right)\right]=\frac{-2x\left(x^{2}+3\right)}{\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{3}} \end{aligned}$$ $$f''(x)=\frac{2x\left(x^{2}+3\right)}{\left(x^{2}-1\right)^{3}}$$ Since $x^{2}+3>0$, the numerator has the sign of $x$ and the denominator the sign of $x^{2}-1$: | Interval | numerator | denominator | $f''$ | Concavity | |---|---|---|---|---| | $(-\infty,-1)$ | $-$ | $+$ | $-$ | down | | $(-1,0)$ | $-$ | $-$ | $+$ | up | | $(0,1)$ | $+$ | $-$ | $-$ | down | | $(1,\infty)$ | $+$ | $+$ | $+$ | up | The only concavity change at a point of the domain is $x=0$, so the single inflection point is $(0,0)$ (the changes at $x=\pm1$ occur across vertical asymptotes and do not count). **Sketch:** far left, the curve comes up along $y=x$ from below, rises to the local maximum $\left(-\sqrt3,-\frac{3\sqrt3}{2}\right)$ (concave down), then falls to $-\infty$ at $x=-1^-$. On $(-1,1)$ it descends from $+\infty$ through the origin — where it flattens momentarily, crosses $y=x$ and switches from concave up to concave down — down to $-\infty$ at $x=1^-$. On $(1,\infty)$ it falls from $+\infty$ to the local minimum $\left(\sqrt3,\frac{3\sqrt3}{2}\right)$, then rises, concave up, approaching $y=x$ from above. The whole figure is symmetric about the origin.Carry out a full analysis and sketch of : domain, intercepts, all asymptotes with one-sided and end limits, monotonicity, extrema, concavity, and inflection points.
Show hint
There is no -intercept because is never zero; treat the two branches and separately, and use the quotient rule twice.
Show answer
Domain: , i.e. .
Intercepts: for all , so : no -intercept. And is excluded, so no -intercept. Note for and for . Symmetry: none.
Vertical asymptote : the numerator , so
End behaviour.
- As : the form is , numerator and denominator are differentiable on , and the derivative of the denominator is , so l'Hopital's Rule applies: . The new limit is , which is one of the permitted outcomes, so the step is legitimate. No asymptote on the right.
- As : and , so — no indeterminate form, and l'Hopital is not applicable. Since there, is a horizontal asymptote approached from below, only as .
First derivative (quotient rule): Since and for , the sign of is the sign of . The only critical number is ( is not in the domain).
| Interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| decreasing | |||
| decreasing | |||
| increasing |
Local minimum at : , the point . It is the absolute minimum of the right branch (on ), but not of overall, since as . The left branch has no extremum: it decreases from down to .
Second derivative. Differentiate :
f''(x)&=e^{x}(x-1)x^{-2}+e^{x}\cdot x^{-2}+e^{x}(x-1)\left(-2x^{-3}\right)\\ &=e^{x}x^{-3}\left[x(x-1)+x-2(x-1)\right]\\ &=e^{x}x^{-3}\left[x^{2}-x+x-2x+2\right]=\frac{e^{x}\left(x^{2}-2x+2\right)}{x^{3}} \end{aligned}$$ Now $x^{2}-2x+2=(x-1)^{2}+1\ge1>0$ for every $x$, and $e^{x}>0$, so $f''$ has the sign of $x^{3}$: - $f''<0$ on $(-\infty,0)$: concave **down**; - $f''>0$ on $(0,\infty)$: concave **up**. There is **no inflection point**: the only sign change of $f''$ happens at $x=0$, which is not in the domain (it is the vertical asymptote). **Consistency check:** $f''(1)=\dfrac{e\left(1-2+2\right)}{1}=e>0$, confirming the local minimum at $x=1$ via the Second Derivative Test. **Sketch:** the left branch enters from the left just below the $x$-axis, decreasing and concave down, and plunges to $-\infty$ as $x\to0^-$. The right branch comes down from $+\infty$ at $x=0^+$, concave up, reaches the minimum $(1,e)$, and then increases without bound, still concave up (in fact faster than any line).Each statement below is false. For each one, give an explicit counterexample and state the correct version of the rule.
(a) If , then the graph of has an inflection point at .
(b) If the denominator of a rational function is zero at , then is a vertical asymptote.
(c) A graph can never cross an asymptote.
(d) If , then has a local maximum or a local minimum at .
(e) If does not exist, then cannot have a local extremum at .
(f) If is increasing on and increasing on , then is increasing on .
Show hint
For each claim, ask which hypothesis of the real theorem has been dropped: a sign change, a cancellation, a domain restriction, or continuity.
Show answer
(a) Counterexample: at . Then , so , yet everywhere: the curve is concave up on both sides and is a minimum, not an inflection point. Correct version: is an inflection point when is continuous at and changes sign at . If exists, is necessary but never sufficient.
(b) Counterexample: for . The denominator vanishes at , but is finite: the graph has a hole at , no asymptote. Correct version: cancel all common factors first; is a vertical asymptote precisely when at least one one-sided limit of at is or , which for a reduced rational function means with .
(c) Counterexamples: has horizontal asymptote and crosses it at the origin; crosses its slant asymptote at the origin; crosses infinitely often. Correct version: only vertical asymptotes are never crossed (the value is not in the domain). A horizontal or slant asymptote describes the tails only, and may be crossed any number of times.
(d) Counterexample: at . Then and , but everywhere, so is increasing and is neither a maximum nor a minimum (just a horizontal tangent). The same happens at for . Correct version: makes a critical number, which is only a candidate; apply the First Derivative Test (or the Second Derivative Test when ) to classify it.
(e) Counterexample: , or , at . In both cases does not exist, yet is the absolute minimum. Correct version: is a critical number when is in the domain of and either or fails to exist. Corners, cusps and vertical tangents must always be tested.
(f) Counterexample: has , so is increasing on and on ; but while , so and is certainly not increasing on the union. Correct version: the Increasing/Decreasing Test needs continuous on the whole interval. Monotonicity statements must be reported interval by interval and never joined across a point that is missing from the domain (a vertical asymptote, hole, or jump).
